
Bart Vanderhaegen
@b_vanderhaegen
Interested in Critical Rationalism, Austrian Economics & Physics
Podcast: open.spotify.com/show/0hypZrKSlโฆ
ID: 2152866589
24-10-2013 12:23:27
3,3K Tweet
806 Takipรงi
1,1K Takip Edilen

A typical plan says what to do/ achieve by when and whom. An enhancement to a typical plan is to also ๐ฅ๐ก๐๐ฃ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐๐ค๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐จ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ง๐ค๐ง๐จ ๐๐ฃ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ก๐๐ฃ: - on what aspects of the plan - how: by what measurement or argument - by who - how frequently

Bart Vanderhaegen Elon Musk Yes, I am an Everettian. The Many-Worlds Interpretation elegantly adheres to quantum mechanics' mathematics without ad-hoc collapses, resolving paradoxes like measurement while embracing wave function universality. It's the most coherent view, despite its ontological boldness.




Say you have an idea to solve a problem: a set of choices and actions that you expect can achieve a goal. Then there are 2 different ways to treat that idea: 1๏ธโฃ ๐ฟ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ (๐ฉ๐ง๐ฎ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฉ ๐๐จ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ) By arguing that it is in





New episode with Bart Vanderhaegen! Bart explains his Problem based management method, built on Critical Rationalism. We cover how organizations can support knowledge creation and avoid the common traps of defending ideas instead of improving them: youtu.be/ZlCxULjnCyE?siโฆ


The woven web of epistemology widens. Bart Vanderhaegen applies the ideas of Popper and Deutsch to some interesting cases:



Nitpicking still possible, but the kind of difference is relevant: - ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐จ are either true or false (binary) - ๐๐ญ๐ฅ๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ๐จ/ ๐ฉ๐๐๐ค๐ง๐๐๐จ contain (plenty of) mistakes (not binary) Mistakes are contradictions between purported causes for some effect, or

