Many thanks, Don!

Reads like a list of who's who of the Privacy Law Scholars Conference---10 most cited Law & Technology faculty in the U.S., 2019-2023 leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2024/08… Congrats Danielle Citron Daniel J. Solove Frank Pasquale and others

"The Limits of the CDA Section 230: Accountability for Algorithmic Decisions" – my take on the groundbreaking 3rd Circuit decision in Anderson v. TikTok teachprivacy.com/the-limits-of-…

This is indeed a groundbreaking decision, and it should be getting more attention. I have written a post about it here: teachprivacy.com/the-limits-of-…

You just don’t want to have to tell the topic its Miranda rights.

1/7 Academic publishers have now licensed their authors' content for use in AI without an opt out for the authors; these companies make big money and rely on authors and reviewers for mostly free (or severely underpaid) labor. thebookseller.com/news/wiley-set…

2/7 Law reviews are oft criticized for a lack of peer review, but one great thing about them is that they don't exploit authors like other academic publishers. Law reviews make content widely available, and for free. Other journals often put academic work behind a paywall.

3/7 Peer review relies on the good will of academics to review (often for free or a pittance). Shouldn't publishers be doing this, since they are making so much money? Articles are then put behind paywalls.

4/7 It seems that in today's digital age, academics are being exploited by journals. They'd be better off just creating their own system of publishing since it's their content and their peer review.

NEW - NIST Privacy Framework Training Course: bit.ly/3YEAbe0 We also have a NIST Privacy Framework Whiteboard. #PrivacyMatters

Truly a pleasure to have Daniel J. Solove with us today Emory Law discussing his latest paper: Against Privacy Essentialism. The paper continues a trenchant and lively debate in the privacy law community about how to define privacy.