WM (@apteacher1754) 's Twitter Profile
WM

@apteacher1754

History Podcaster Early Atlantic šŸŒŽ, Former East Haarlem HS Admin & AP Teacher, The Friends of Philipse Manor Hall Board Member, Francophone and 🚢 Traveler.

ID: 1491443521953411085

linkhttps://youtube.com/@APTeacher1754?feature=shared calendar_today09-02-2022 16:07:17

128,128K Tweet

2,2K Followers

6,6K Following

Yesh Ginsburg (@yesh222) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The people who started the "globalize the intifada" movement certainly didn't mean nonviolence. The group and its leader actively cheered on October 7th. So I can only imagine that, when all of their "supporters" are trying to redefine their phrase, they feel something like this:

The people who started the "globalize the intifada" movement certainly didn't mean nonviolence. The group and its leader actively cheered on October 7th. So I can only imagine that, when all of their "supporters" are trying to redefine their phrase, they feel something like this:
WM (@apteacher1754) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We aren’t converting this progressive papal choir and they are a very small concentrated minority, given the recent complete political realignment based on class.

WM (@apteacher1754) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Going rogue with the Roma Chicken tonight, my wife hates capers, so I’m going to substitute lemon, should work well with the fingerling potatoes too!

CA ET Nerd (@earlyvotedata) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Supreme Court Ruling: Trump v. CASA Barrett writes the opinion. 6-3 decision. Basically Trump administration wins their case. A partial stay in put in place on the lower court (and possibly other courts as well) in this case.

Sean T at RCP (@seantrende) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Trump v. Casa (birthright citizenship) is a Barrett opinion. Looks like a blunderbuss against national injunctions. This is a genuine "holy crap" decision. If you've been waiting for SCOTUS to rein in anti-Trump district courts, this one's for you (Varad Mehta )

Legal Phil (@legal_fil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

That Barrett response to Jackson. Holy cow. Barrett is absolutely correct, but I’ve never seen a judge basically say, ā€œX doesn’t know what she is talking about and, frankly, doesn’t even seem interested in abiding by the judicial oath we took.ā€

WM (@apteacher1754) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Universal injunctions by local district judges nuked by SCOTUS, no more nationwide halts on any administrative progress.

WM (@apteacher1754) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The fact that you are using the term ā€œnatal,ā€ despite there being ZERO peer reviewed and globally awarded scientific breakthroughs that say otherwise. Your operating from a pov that this is reality, I’m operating on the premise that is most certainly is not, hence we aren’t the

WM (@apteacher1754) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Super weird cope as it was predominantly progressive judge shopping by liberal AGs that forced SCOTUS to rein in their madness, stick to the legalese and leave the interpretation to the savvy.

WM (@apteacher1754) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The echo chamber is closed so tightly, they’ve only ever been challenged by the reverberation of their own voice.