profile-img
Amie Peck

@apeckerpeck

Passionate about Canadian Beef, Show Jumping and Golden Retrievers. Public and Stakeholder Engagement with Canadian Cattlemen's Association. Tweets are my own.

calendar_today30-10-2014 12:08:27

708 Tweets

1,0K Followers

1,2K Following

Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In a recent CBC News article, a researcher suggested that reducing beef consumption by 25% would result in a reduction of livestock related emissions of 10%. Sounds good, but… (3/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

…in Canada, thanks to Canadian Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (CRSB), we have a full Life Cycle Analysis, which found that the industry contributes 2.4% of our national emissions. So, reducing livestock emissions by 10% would result in a national emissions reduction of 0.2%. (4/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

While small, any reduction in emissions is a step forward, right? However, measuring the pros and cons is more complex than that. Emissions are just one way one to measure sustainability, just one way of looking at the carbon footprint of our diet . (5/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

There are many benefits we receive from having cattle on the land, which is supported by conservation partners like Ducks Unlimited CAN, NatureConservancy.ca | Conservationdelanature.ca, Birds Canada to name a few. So let’s also imagine a 25% reduction in these environmental benefits. (6/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

35 million acres of native temperate grasslands are cared for by the families that raise beef cattle. This is one of the most ecosystems in the entire world with less than 26% remaining intact. Grasslands are the coral reefs of Canada. (7/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A 25% reduction of this land would be 8,750,000 million acres potentially lost to development. That land would be equal to 56x the size of Toronto or 300x the size of Vancouver. (8/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Of ALL ag land in Canada, pastures and grasslands where beef cattle are raised provide the majority of wildlife habitat– close to 70%. Reducing the beef herd by 25% would result in 17.5% less wildlife habitat across this country, impacting some of the most at-risk species. (9/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Finally, those lands where beef cattle are raised currently store 1.5 billion tonnes of carbon in the soil. According to Bork (2013) cultivation of grasslands can result in 30 – 50% of the carbon being lost. That could mean up to 187.5 million tonnes of carbon released (10/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Calculating from 's national emissions in 2019 (730 million tonnes), that soil carbon loss would represent more than ONE THIRD of our national emissions (38%). (11/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Regardless of whether you eat or not, cattle in Canada provide benefits in the form of preserving grasslands, wildlife habitat and sequestering carbon. (12/13)

account_circle
Amie Peck(@apeckerpeck) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Reducing your beef consumption to benefit the environment might actually hurt more than it helps. Sometimes what you thought was the problem, is really part of the solution. Hope to see you tonight at the premiere. (13/13).

account_circle