Anna Ciaunica @annaciaunica.bsky.social (@annaciaunica) 's Twitter Profile
Anna Ciaunica @annaciaunica.bsky.social

@annaciaunica

Philosopher/Cognitive scientist |PI working on Self-Consciousness, Embodiment & Social Interactions in Humans & Artificial Agents | RT not endorsement

ID: 828361667918569472

linkhttps://annaciaunica.fr calendar_today05-02-2017 21:56:26

19,19K Tweet

12,12K Followers

10,10K Following

New Scientist (@newscientist) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Our bodies emit a stream of low-energy photons, and now experiments in mice have revealed that this ghostly glow is cut off when we die newscientist.com/article/247959…

Michael Timothy Bennett (@mitibennett) 's Twitter Profile Photo

the deadline approaches. some amazing submissions this year, keep it up! 21 hours left until end of day, 12th of may, anywhere on earth. there is still time to write another paper! The Artificial General Intelligence Society

the deadline approaches. some amazing submissions this year, keep it up! 21 hours left until end of day, 12th of may, anywhere on earth. there is still time to write another paper! <a href="/AGI_Society/">The Artificial General Intelligence Society</a>
Philosophical Psychology (@journalphp) 's Twitter Profile Photo

For #MentalHealthAwarenessWeek, we share some of our open access papers which further our understanding of mental health. Today we propose this review paper, which is the most cited in the last 3 years, on epistemic injustice, by Ian James Kidd et al.: doi.org/10.1080/095150…

Anna Ciaunica @annaciaunica.bsky.social (@annaciaunica) 's Twitter Profile Photo

New preprint! The No Body Problem: Intelligence and Selfhood in Biological and Artificial Systems Why is it easier to ascribe intelligence to minds but not to bodies? I answer this by tackling one of the most daunting problems living beings face: death osf.io/preprints/psya…

New preprint! The No Body Problem: Intelligence and Selfhood in Biological and Artificial Systems

Why is it easier to ascribe intelligence to minds but not to bodies?
 I answer this  by tackling one of the most daunting problems living beings face: death
osf.io/preprints/psya…
Jesus Ramirez-Bermudez (@jrbneuropsiq) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I wonderful contribution by Anna Ciaunica @annaciaunica.bsky.social on #consciousness , intelligence and #selfhood. "As finite beings, biological sys-tems must first learn to carefully strike a balance between what information is worth qualitatively processing for their body survival, and what information

Jesus Ramirez-Bermudez (@jrbneuropsiq) 's Twitter Profile Photo

the system must “let go” and discard. By contrast, artificial intelligence pro-cesses rapidly a quantitatively impressive amount of information in a purely cumulative way, as if eternity and infi-nite, unlimited energetic resources were available to them. By having a no body

Jesus Ramirez-Bermudez (@jrbneuropsiq) 's Twitter Profile Photo

problem, these systems have no death problem. However, in real worlds (as opposed to abstract formal worlds), resources are not infinite, and thus eternity is not available to artificial systems either. Since the latter are a product of human mind design, they remain dependent

Jesus Ramirez-Bermudez (@jrbneuropsiq) 's Twitter Profile Photo

on human computing and earthly energetic resources. From the wider perspective of biological life (i.e. limited time & energy constrained self-organising systems), artificial intelligence-based systems are less adaptive & less “smart” than biological intelligence-based systems."