R2 = 8.31!!!! It explains 831% of the variance of the dataset!

Towards a more robust comparative oncology: a Bayesian reanalysis of Peto’s paradox and discussion of comparative cancer risk studies in vertebrates royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…

I guess there are no more excuses anymore not to publish you papers along with the raw data and the codes used to do the statistical analyses. Otherwise as the AIs improve, how do we ever know if a paper is based on a real experiment or just an imaginary one?

I remember reading papers wrote in the 1990's-2000's arguing that at this stage HeLa has mutated and changed so much that it can be considered as a new microbial species.

A pleasure to have contributed to this very stimulating manuscript proposing a novel hypothesis on how some pathologies of senescence structure themselves to persist over period of time of years to decades. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ac…

A tumoural hydra from my laboratory with a lot of supernumerary tentacles (only tumoural individuals develop that many tentacles), and a little bud growing on top of it. We nickname those hydras "pumpkin" because the tumour grow so big it turns hydras into a pumpkin shape.