The classic “leading stocks in leading groups” doesn’t always work in the context of swing trading Money flows in/out of these names based on much more than “it’s a hot group/theme” There has to be a REASON for the name to go up, which is the basis of episodic pivots:

Possible nazi grok explanation? You can send invisible prompts to grok.

prison szn is so back.

It's crazy that scientists ever believed this tbh.

4. As a developer in the study, it's striking to me how much more capable the models have gotten since February (when I was participating in the study) I'm trying to recall if I was even using agents at the start. Certainly the later models (Opus 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro, o3 could just

Mid term (1-3mte) ibit options are quite a good play IMO, if you believe the breakout / impulse hypothesis.

Pathological liar tells all (his lies)

TBH since the whole cursor fiasco I my main thought was 'wow if i was openai I would be trying to get out of the windsurf deal'

new rug method dropped

new odd taxi season is crazy

Wonder if they'll try to emulate the tax haven route of Dubai / UAE?

how does my live trend performance compare to general trend models in crypto? I'll go through a few variations of different trend styles, and decompose my long-only trend model return as I go. first why should I decompose my returns?

Update: After I posted this, I received info from senior Windsurf staff that indicated employees aren't getting properly taken care of, and the founders have not exercised duty of care with this acquisition. If so, that *sucks* — founders have a sacred obligation to the team.

you're vibe coding a saas i'm vibe advertising a paid group

Important, $305mm cash + $583mm HYPE Large enough to get to $1B mcap quickly and be of consideration to most funds

Releasing this tomorrow: A framework for recreating Grok Heavy functionality. In this video, I'm using Claude 4 Heavy, but it works with any model (GPT, Kimi, Gemini).