
Aleksandra Ancite-Jepifánova
@alexandraancite
Senior Fellow @CEUDemInst #RuleofLawClinic • Research Affiliate @RLI_News • PhD from @QMSchoolofLaw • Migration & asylum • My research rb.gy/q2kqxq
ID: 1417557319454531586
https://brill.com/display/title/61170 20-07-2021 18:49:48
379 Tweet
516 Followers
1,1K Following

Our research shows that assaults against human rights is a poor way to defend human rights and the rule of law: link.springer.com/article/10.100… Miss von der Leyen is wrong. Aleksandra Ancite-Jepifánova Sarah Ganty Springer Nature

Families belong together! States have a legal obligation to uphold the principle of family unity for refugees. UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency has issued new guidelines on family reunification, providing guidance for developing effective family reunification procedures: refworld.org/policy/legalgu…


Why has the EU supported Ukraine but ‘othered’ Palestine? Juan Roch Gonzalez & I just published the article “The Colonial Imaginary of ‘Europe’ in the EU’s Asymmetrical Response to the Russian and Israeli Aggressions” in JCMS. Check it out in open access👇 onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…

[READ] Following the passing of the amendment to Iraq’s Personal Status Law 188, Rend Al-Rahim’s warnings about its devastating impact on women, children, and Iraqi society as a whole are now a stark reality. Full article ⬇️ buff.ly/4dp4qKl


You can find my take on Poland’s “suspension of the right to asylum” and its impact on the EU’s common #asylum framework in EUobserver. I highlight how the common asylum policy is effectively unraveling, with broad political support for its demise. euobserver.com/migration/ard2…

In February, I attended #ECtHR GC hearings in three 🇪🇺-#Belarus border cases involving alleged “migrant #instrumentalisation”. In my latest piece for Verfassungsblog I show why 🇱🇻🇱🇹🇵🇱 arguments cannot justify any derogations from #asylum seekers' rights. verfassungsblog.de/eu-belarus-bor…


Great analysis by Aleksandra Ancite-Jepifánova. I would add one point: while one might theoretically imagine ‘no violation’ of Art. 4 Prot. 4 due to an expansive reading of the ND & NT exception, there must be a violation of Art. 3 if the Court takes its absolute character seriously.



✍️ On Verfassungsblog, our Senior Research Fellow Aleksandra Ancite-Jepifánova analyzes the "migrant instrumentalization" cases currently considered by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Details: 👉 tinyurl.com/y4z6dat3

