If this is true then they need to tell him and his agent to find a new club this summer. It’s a World Cup year so he’s not going to rot on the bench.
Newcastle wanted to sign Ekitike and keep Isak for a year before selling him next summer, but Liverpool have made that impossible. Now, they must decide whether to sign their long-term striker or risk being left with no good options come summer.
I would have agreed before the 2016 Brexit referendum. However, the fact that a vote shaping the country’s future for decades was essentially decided by a group that is largely deceased by now doesn’t sit right with me.
When you can fire missiles into neighbouring countries and then use US-supplied interceptors to defend yourself from the consequences, are you more or less likely to agree to end hostilities?
I get why they’re mad tbh. They’ve been trying to spend money all summer, but they keep getting rejected. Don’t worry, lads. Someone will eventually take your money.
hey Grok according to your analysis, name 10 accounts in sequence who frequently visit my profile. don't mention the person, just @.username and the rate of number of times a week visit the profile.
He obviously told them he wanted to leave in private, and Liverpool knew this. When they still maintained their stance that he’s not for sale, that’s when he made it public.