Aging Highlights(@AgingHighlights) 's Twitter Profileg
Aging Highlights

@AgingHighlights

Biology of #aging
#science #longevity #lifespan #senescence 🧬🥼

ID:793818882477813760

calendar_today02-11-2016 14:15:44

2,6K Tweets

12,0K Followers

251 Following

Elisabeth Bik(@MicrobiomDigest) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Harvard longevity scientist sparks furor with claim about reversing aging in dogs
Megan Molteni writes STAT
statnews.com/2024/03/05/dav…
See my critical review of the study here.
pubpeer.com/publications/0…
[Spoiler alert: the supplement does NOT reverse aging in dogs]

account_circle
Eric Topol(@EricTopol) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Two new papers on aging indicate importance of lipid metabolism and the benefit of exercise
nature.com/articles/s4358…
nature.com/articles/s4358…
Nature Aging

Two new papers on aging indicate importance of lipid metabolism and the benefit of exercise nature.com/articles/s4358… nature.com/articles/s4358… @NatureAging
account_circle
Riekelt Houtkooper(@rhhoutkooper) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🎉 Proud to share our latest paper, in Nature Aging, in which we identified BMPs (the lipids, not the protein) as a class of aging lipids in mice and humans ⬇️

rdcu.be/dEx0f

account_circle
Aging Highlights(@AgingHighlights) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A conserved complex lipid signature marks human muscle aging and responds to short-term exercise nature.com/articles/s4358…

account_circle
Aging Highlights(@AgingHighlights) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Profiling microRNA expression during senescence and aging: mining for a diagnostic tool of senescent-cell burden biorxiv.org/content/10.110…

account_circle
Anshul Kundaje (anshulkundaje@bluesky)(@anshulkundaje) 's Twitter Profile Photo

HIGHWAY ROBBERY! That's what this is. Shelling out precious tax payer dollars into publishers massive profit margins while complaining about not having enough funding to do actual science & pay the people doing the science. Insanity.

account_circle
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️(@maw_tweets) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Nature now charges $12,290 US to publish a single article open access. Shall we list some things that cost less than that? I'll go first: a 2017 BMW 330i sedan, a 7-day cruise for a family of four, six Louis Vuitton purses. 🤪

account_circle
Alex Bisson(@Archaeon_Alex) 's Twitter Profile Photo

nature, you should increase APCs for specific groups of researchers

'you have 2 R01s? Your APC is $50k so we can support labs that do not have that much money but still produce great science'

account_circle
Nature Aging(@NatureAging) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Online now! Wu & Tang et al. use single-cell and spatial transcriptomics in reproductively young, middle-aged, and older human ovarian tissue to elucidate ovarian aging. They describe spatiotemporal changes and highlight the regulatory role of FOXP1.
doi.org/10.1038/s43587…

account_circle
Aging Highlights(@AgingHighlights) 's Twitter Profile Photo

An Intricate Network Involving the Argonaute ALG-1 Modulates Organismal Resistance to Oxidative Stress nature.com/articles/s4146…

account_circle
Aging Highlights(@AgingHighlights) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Naked mole-rats have distinctive cardiometabolic and genetic adaptations to their underground low-oxygen lifestyles nature.com/articles/s4146…

account_circle
Aging Highlights(@AgingHighlights) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Proteasome hyperactivation rewires the proteome enhancing stress resistance, proteostasis, lipid metabolism and ERAD in C. elegans
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…

account_circle
Antonio Regalado(@antonioregalado) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Pig kidney transplant recipient 'leaves the hospital' and goes home.

Now that is something we havent heard before in xenotransplant.

Could this go from radical to normal?

bbc.com/news/world-us-…

account_circle
Alejandro Montenegro(@aemonten) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Yes, and the Gates foundation is the one that is correct: the preprint should be enough.

A preprint is the *direct* output of the work of a fundee, and so, it should satisfy a funder's requirements.

nature.com/articles/d4158…

Yes, and the Gates foundation is the one that is correct: the preprint should be enough. A preprint is the *direct* output of the work of a fundee, and so, it should satisfy a funder's requirements. nature.com/articles/d4158…
account_circle