🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

1. There's no such thing as moral or immoral comedy or moral or immoral stand-up. 2. Or, for that matter, legal or illegal comedy. 3. Comedy is either well-written or badly-written; Funny or not funny. 4. And, in no case should it ever lead to an FIR. 5. The only exception

Freedom of Speech As well as - Freedom After Speech

Another important verdict in a S. 376 trial yesterday by a Patiala House Court. An acquittal in what was clearly a false implication. The Court did not only 'acquit' the accused but 'honourably acquitted'. This is important as honourably acquitted, in this context, means:

Merely 2 chapters into it and I can already say that : this is one of the most important books to be written on the Indian Trial Courts, ever..... and long, long due..... Thank you! T. Prashant Reddy Chitrakshi

I review for Scroll - a very insightful book written by T. Prashant Reddy and Chitrakshi. This book is a must read for anyone interested in understanding how the justice system (and trial courts, especially) work (or doesn’t) in India........ scroll.in/article/108123… Scroll.in

Constitutional silences are - actually - very telling and eloquent. They speak the language of basic structure which is the very soul of our Constitution.

In a democracy, whenever legislature & executive falter, the judiciary must step up. Especially, when there's violation of fundamental rights & erosion of basic structure. Judicial activism isn't overreach— it's Constitution in action, safeguarding rights & ensuring justice.

Looking forward to this at 6:30 PM today at IIC, Delhi.

Remembering Bharat Chugh Sir who would type his own judgements during his tenure at Delhi Judicial Services saving time of litigants and Courts'.

The judiciary has neither the sword nor the purse. Its only real power is people's confidence. Everything it does (or doesn't) must preserve that legitimacy - or it risks losing the very ground it stands on. And that would be the end of Rule of Law as we know it.

Grateful to have had the opportunity to contribute to a matter that truly mattered. These 380 teachers (termed 'contract teachers') had long been denied equal pay for equal work and basic dignity. Despite almost a decade of service, they were being paid only 31k a month.

My take on the recent SC judgment on mandatory three years practice: 1. I can speak from experience that young, idealistic and extremely talented youth aspire to be adjudicators. Telling them to park the aspiration for 3 years and enter practice instead may hurt this aspiration

Judicial education & training is a specialised field and we just haven’t paid it enough attention in India. What we severely lack in those fields, cannot be offset by setting a 3-yr practice rule to become judges. Wrong solution to a very serious problem.

Equal Pay for Equal Work Prevails: Supreme Court Upholds RMSA Teachers’ Right to Parity bharatchugh.in/2025/05/21/equ…

Short Book Review: Small Boat by Vincent Delecroix A 4.5 out of 5 for me. 0.5 mark less, and that too only because it simply wasn’t long enough. No great book ever is. I said the same thing after reading the 1500 page The Suitable Boy. But this one’s actually very short. About

Good debating T. Prashant Reddy on this issue particularly close to my heart. And Aaratrika Bhaumik Brilliantly done, as always. The Hindu