‼️ تلاعب بتراث ابن تيمية من محقق الانتصار لأهل الأثر : ابن تيمية لم يمدح كتاب إلجام العوام عن علم الكلام ولم يزعم أنه رجوع من الغزالي ✅ كنت اليوم أقرأ كتاب الانتصار لأهل الأثر لشيخ الإسلام ولما وصلت إلى ص. 106 وجدت شيئا في غاية الغرابة! 💠أثبت المحقق في النص هذا الكلام: "*

Daniel Haqiqatjou 👇Shia Ayatollah Khomein says Aisha (ra) and other companions (ra) were dirtier than pigs and dogs These are the people@Haqiqatjou wants unity with

✅ رد على السرورية وحميرهم: هل امتنع ابن تيمية عن تكفير الجعد بن درهم؟ 📕 رأيت السرورية يحتجون بنص لابن تيمية ويقولون إن هذا النص دال على أن الجعد بن درهم ليس كافرا وأن المسلمين إنما قتلوه لدفع ضرره لا لكفره! 📗 ثم رأيت بعض الغلاة ممن ليس عندهم بالفقه معرفة ولا دراية إنما

Daniel Haqiqatjou 1. Yes, sure, Abu Hanifa's misguidance should be studied so that people avoid it and do not become like you 2. O concubine of the Rafidah, Imam Harb al-Kirmani does not reject qiyas in its entirety. He rejects the reprehensible qiyas, the qiyas with which Abu Hanifa and his

The following are NOT obstacles of Takfir despite the fact that some individuals may believe that they are: • Being famous or known • Having a lot of knowledge • Being an author of many books • Having a long beard • Speaking Arabic fluently • To have Tazkiyyah from a

Today is the death anniversary of this Muslim man Osama bin Laden May God have mercy on him and on all Muslims. These are his kind words regarding not being fanatical about groups or nationalities. Unfortunately, those who claim to follow him did the exact opposite. They split,

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗺𝗮𝗺 𝗮𝗹-𝗡𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘄𝗶 𝗗𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗺𝗮 It shows how the Wahhabis contradict themselves in less than a minute.

Imām al-Barbahārī said: "And they (the Jahmiyyah) declared Takfir on those who opposed them, so the ignorant, the naive, and the one without knowledge were included in their statement, until they fell into Kufr without knowing it." [Sharh as-Sunnah, P. 95] Udhur bil Jahl??

Ibn al-Mibrad رحمه الله said: “and we don’t know anyone from the Hanabilah who was an Ashari nor liked the ascription to them.”

Hammad ibn Salamah said: Abu Hanifa was a devil who would confront the athars (hadiths) of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) and reject them with his own opinion.

Eating the god of hindus because they got mad i cooked them now im pissing them off more.

How can someone knowingly glorifies deviants like al-Nawawi & al-Suyūti while making tabdīʿ of their poor followers? This is like the Ashāʿirah who glorify the messenger ﷺ, the Salaf, and the Imams of Ahl al-Sunnah like al-Bukhari while calling their followers Mushabbihah 🤷🏻‍♂️

In defense of Imām Abū ‘Abd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl ibn Ibrāhīm ibn al-Mughīrah ibn Bardizbah al-Ju‘fī al-Bukhārī. To the accusation that he is from among the lafẓiyyah.

يقول الإمام ابن خزيمة [³¹¹هـ] : من لم يقل إن الله في السماء على العرش استوى ،ضُرِبَت عُنقُه وأُلقيَت جيفته على مزبلة بعيدة عن البلد ،حتى لا يتأذى بنتن رائحتها أحد من المسلمين ولا المعاهدين . [ذم الكلام وأهله للهروي 535] .

What modern scholars have made general takfir of Asha'irah & have they written any books? Sh Sulayman bin Sahman with support from Aal-Sheikh scholars archive.org/details/202001… Sh Adil Aal-Hamdan archive.org/details/takfer… Sh Khalid Al-Marady Al-Ghamidi archive.org/details/aulski…