Anastasia Berg (@a_n_a_berg) 's Twitter Profile
Anastasia Berg

@a_n_a_berg

Assistant Professor of Philosophy @UCIrvine; editor @the_point_mag; What Are Children For? with @rachelcwiseman out June 11 in the US; August 15 in the UK

ID: 800835257872351232

linkhttp://anastasiaberg.com calendar_today21-11-2016 22:56:19

2,2K Tweet

3,3K Followers

724 Following

Commonweal Magazine (@commonwealmag) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"If you’re invested in a human future, you are invested in the legitimacy of people having children, even if you yourself decide not to have them, or can’t." — Anastasia Berg commonwealmagazine.org/have-or-have-n…

Anastasia Berg (@a_n_a_berg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

For The Chronicle of Higher Education Rachel Wiseman and I discuss ambivalence about having kids in the academy, what it really means to be a so-called “ally” and if I’m so skeptical of the self-evidence of the logic of postponement, why did I wait so long to have kids? chronicle.com/article/should…

Anastasia Berg (@a_n_a_berg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

For the title Rachel suggested “The Three Body Problem” but I worried it would suggest the piece is about polyamorous spousal hires and readers would feel cheated

Wisdom of Crowds (@wcrowdslive) 's Twitter Profile Photo

One of our best recent episodes: Anastasia Berg (Anastasia Berg) and Rachel Wiseman (Rachel Wiseman) on their new book, WHAT ARE CHILDREN FOR? which tackles, head-on, all the questions and anxieties shared by anyone starting a family today. (w/Damir Marusic & @christineemba) Listen

Anastasia Berg (@a_n_a_berg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

On the Novara Media show we discussed why leftists should care about the rising ambivalence about having kids and what I really think about Megyn Kelly reading excerpts of our work to JD Vance. Thank you Michael Walker! Our segment starts at 30:45. youtube.com/watch?v=Py-D4F…

Shadi Hamid (@shadihamid) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This review essay by Jennifer A. Frey on parenting, children, and what it means to embrace one's own loss of autonomy is brilliant and quite moving, which is an unusual combination: wsj.com/arts-culture/b…

Anastasia Berg (@a_n_a_berg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

One of the best parts of talking to people from around the world about the book is discovering just how widely the analysis of ambivalence applies. Thank you Pablo Maillé for a brilliant conversation! Usbek & Rica usbeketrica.com/fr/article/etr…

Amanpour and Company (@amanpourcopbs) 's Twitter Profile Photo

JD Vance’s recent “childless cat ladies” comment has put childbearing in the spotlight. “What Are Children For?” co-author Rachel Wiseman explains why many young people are choosing to postpone or forego parenthood. Anastasia Berg Michel Martin

Anastasia Berg (@a_n_a_berg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Amazing to get to speak to Michel Martin on the Amanpour and Company show last week about rising parenting ambivalence, the eruption of the topic in the US, and what’s missing from our public conversation about children. Full interview is now available online

The Point Magazine (@the_point_mag) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Post-panel glow: Point managing editor Rachel Wiseman and co-author of “What Are Children For?” in conversation with Peter C. Baker and Conceivable Future about climate change and reproductive choice this morning at Printers Row Lit Fest.

Post-panel glow: Point managing editor <a href="/rachelcwiseman/">Rachel Wiseman</a> and co-author of “What Are Children For?” in conversation with <a href="/apcbapcb/">Peter C. Baker</a> and <a href="/ConceivableFut/">Conceivable Future</a> about climate change and reproductive choice this morning at <a href="/PrintersRowFest/">Printers Row Lit Fest</a>.