Since Qadianis accept Ar-Raghib Al-Asfahani as a linguistic authority, here is his interpretation of Tawaffi in Ayah 5:117
- The meaning of Tawaffi is taking something, not death, death is only one of the things the word Tawaffi indicates.
- Tawaffi [in 5:117] means taking up.
Az-Zajjaj is yet another linguistic authority who refutes the claim of the Qadiani dajjal about the meaning of Tawaffi.
Az-Zajjaj interpreted Tawaffi in Ayah 47:27 as physically gathering [in the Hellfire].
One of the earliest sources that refutes MGA's fake rule about Tawaffi is the Tafsir of Yahya Ibn Sallam, a 2nd century linguist and a mufassir (d. 200 A.H).
Ibn sallam mentioned [physically taking/driving] as a meaning of [Tawaffi] referencing Al-Hasan Al-Basri's interpretation.
This is expected from someone who thinksخلق منها زوجها means that Adam ﷺ was created from a female. Do theحشر, beating and entering Hellfire happen to the souls only ?🤡🤡
And no, it's not just Al-Hasan Al-Basri who refuted the fake rule of your dajjal, many other linguists did.
MGA the linguistic genius made a claim that interpreting [Tawaffi] as [Istifa'](completion) is against the rules of the Arabic language.
[Istifa'](completion)as a meaning of [Tawaffi] is mentioned by Az-Zamakhshari who MGA described as an Imam and ’Allamah of the Arabic language.
You should stick to your أمور نادرة, it would be less embarrassing for you.
This rule of yours is made-up, your dajjal himself contradicted it before changing his claims.
Az-Zamakhshari has nothing to do with it, he even said that death is a Majazi meaning of Tawaffi.
According to MGA, taking this Ayah literally is Shirk as it "metaphorically" describes ppl as (servants of Muhammad ﷺ).
MGA likened his description of ppl as (servants of Muhammad ﷺ) in this Ayah to the description of the Prophets ﷺ as (sons of God) in the previous Books.
Grammatical flaws in his own "revelations":
MGA: Allah ﷻ is not bound by grammar, The Qur'an also has similar examples.
Grammatical flaws in someone else's "revelations":
MGA: These revelations are of a much lower order, and are not illumined by the full blaze of Divine light.
Celebrating the newly released English version of MGA's book (A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam), here is the Qadiani official English translation of MGA's affirmation of his belief in "Al-Wilayah At-Takwiniyyah".
"Allah does not allow me to remain in error for even a moment. He safeguards me from every falsehood and protects me from the ways of the wicked."
said the guy who spent more than a decade of his "prophethood" rejecting the core beliefs of his own religion.
Looks like the Qadiani official translators didn't get the memo that the meaning of some Arabic words like ذرية البغايا magically changes to "evil people" when used by MGA.
So, according to Qadianism, it is not clear in Islam whether the Trinity is true in any sense or not, whether ’Isa ﷺ was created or not.🤡🤡
And you don't just get away with holding such beliefs, you even become one of the pious Salaf.🤡🤡
False equivalence as usual, ’Umar(RA) never claimed that the Prophetﷺ is immortal, and the exact time of the death of the Prophetﷺ is not in the Qur'an.
And since you believe that البعث means giving life again, you must believe that its meaning magically changes in these Ayat.
Qadianis should use this miracle to preach their religion. The meanings of words magically change when they use them.
First (ذرية البغايا) and (ولد الحرام) changed their meaning to "evil people", and now (السلف الصالح)
and (علماء الأمة وصلحائها) are not words of praise.😂😂