Even if the man’s tongue was “incorrupt,” so what? Does this negate what God says? “For you are dust, and you will return to dust.”

Claims “scholars” have a better grasp and proceeds to not name any, or provide references. His problem is actually worse, because it’s a dumb idea regardless of the scholarship he picks. Jesus of Nazareth is the most unique figure to ever walk the planet.

That’s fine. There’s at least one Jew who died for you. Repent and believe in the Gospel

Cameron, this is beyond stupid. You should know better. Do you worship a God who is called “the best of all liars”? No? Well, Moslems do. That’s their god, and it ain’t ours.

We’re probably not going to war with Iran. Trump would concede to remove all of his tariffs long before he ever puts America into a war with Iran. Relax! Let Trump be Trump.

This dude has no faith in facts. Someone’s gotta help him!

Post a picture of yourself monitoring the situation.

Say it with me: CHRIST IS LORD!

The mistake you made was reading Joshua and Ecclesiastes as science books. They’re not science books.

Absolutely. See Matthew 22:37!

DOES ROMANS 9:6 TEACH THAT THE CHURCH IS ISRAEL? No. Romans 9:6, which says, "For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel..." does not redefine "Israel" to mean believing Gentiles. It simply means that not every Jew exercises saving faith. This is just as true in

Not just unpopular, but stupid too. Take a journey down Zechariah 14. God is not messing around.

There are 4 kinds of people: 1. Saved — and it shows. 2. Saved — but struggling. 3. Not saved — but think they are. 4. Not saved — and they know it. One of these is very dangerous. And it is the most neglected category.

If I could see anything before I die, I would love to see Reasonable Faith William Lane Craig go on the Joe Rogan podcast for three hours. That would be absolutely epic.