UCT SLSJ (@uslsj) 's Twitter Profile
UCT SLSJ

@uslsj

Students for Law and Social Justice (SLSJ) is a South African students organisation dedicated to protecting human rights and promoting access to justice!

ID: 1105013710890979328

calendar_today11-03-2019 07:52:53

6 Tweet

36 Takipçi

0 Takip Edilen

Judges Matter (@whyjudgesmatter) 's Twitter Profile Photo
Judges Matter
@whyjudgesmatter

7 years ago

For the five vacancies at the Supreme Court of Appeal the following candidates have been nominated: Judge D V Dlodlo Judge C E Heaton Nicholls Judge Y T Mbatha Judge F E Mokgohloa Judge C M Plasket #JudgesMatter #SCA #JSC

For the five vacancies at the Supreme Court of Appeal the following candidates have been nominated: Judge D V Dlodlo Judge C E Heaton Nicholls Judge Y T Mbatha Judge F E Mokgohloa Judge C M Plasket #JudgesMatter #SCA #JSC
UCT SLSJ (@uslsj) 's Twitter Profile Photo
UCT SLSJ
@uslsj

7 years ago

SLSJ stands against #Xenophobia #Afrophobia

UCT SRC (@uct_src) 's Twitter Profile Photo
UCT SRC
@uct_src

7 years ago

#SRC2018_2019 #UCTSRC2018_2019 #UCT #GOT

#SRC2018_2019 #UCTSRC2018_2019 #UCT #GOT
UCT LSC (@uct_lsc) 's Twitter Profile Photo
UCT LSC
@uct_lsc

7 years ago

UCT PhD Law Graduates 😍😍🎉🎉

Constitutional Court (@concourtsa) 's Twitter Profile Photo
Constitutional Court
@concourtsa

7 years ago

Determining parole eligibility by date of sentence differentiates between groups of inmates with no legitimate government purpose and leads to retroactive application of the law. Section 136(1) of the CSA invalid. (Phaahla v Minister).

Determining parole eligibility by date of sentence differentiates between groups of inmates with no legitimate government purpose and leads to retroactive application of the law. Section 136(1) of the CSA invalid. (Phaahla v Minister).
Constitutional Court (@concourtsa) 's Twitter Profile Photo
Constitutional Court
@concourtsa

7 years ago

Judgment: Imposing a prison sentence wholly without parole, running consecutively with (after) a life sentence, violates the Criminal Procedure Act and the Constitution. (Makhokha v State)

Judgment: Imposing a prison sentence wholly without parole, running consecutively with (after) a life sentence, violates the Criminal Procedure Act and the Constitution. (Makhokha v State)