My Op Ed today: SCOTUS justices can imagine their children/grandchildren sending foolish Snapchat rants, but don't fear their own kids — and those who look like them — being targeted for repeated searches or interrogations without Miranda warnings washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/0…

Immensely grateful to Justice Sotomayor for crediting my work on Supreme Court oral argument as changing the Court’s norms and rules cnn.com/2021/10/13/pol…

eventbrite.com/e/voting-right…

Tonja Jacobi joins Emory Law faculty, bringing expertise in SCOTUS | Emory University School of Law | Atlanta, GA law.emory.edu/news-and-event…

Matthew Sag joins Emory Law faculty as part of university AI.Humanity initiative | Emory University School of Law | Atlanta, GA law.emory.edu/news-and-event…

Step 1: refuse to grant a stay, contrary to clear precedent; step 2: leak a draft opinion; step 3 overrule a constitutional right for the first time in history; by then it is old news

🧵📢 The female #SCOTUS justices are STILL being interrupted more than the men--but Barrett less so, according to an updated study featured in this @blaw Insight by Emory Law's Tonja Jacobi #appellatetwitter news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/fe…

This is the inaugural issue of my new regular column on the supreme court an ethics issues at Bloomberg news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/th…

Stopping public corruption should be a bipartisan issue—at the Supreme Court it is bipartisan, but not so much of the stopping news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/ju…

Someone needs to show leadership in the face of Thomas flouting both the law and ethics, and Roberts acted unilaterally in giving himself power during the pandemic, why not now? washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/…

Very excited about this, even though it has nothing to do with the Supreme Court tommythemusical.com

A lot have been made of wins for progressives at the Supreme Court recently, I think there is a darker side: news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/do…

Ted Olson admitted that the independent state legislature theory was pretty weak when he argued it in Bush v Gore, but that didn't stop three current justices embracing the radical notion yesterday, read more here: news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/some-ju…

If the Supreme Court was truly conservative, it would decide as little as it needs to, especially for constitutional cases. Instead, the Court reached as broadly as it possibly could in making affirmative action effectively impossible in higher education: news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-re…

Fun and interesting discussion with the hosts of Madness café podcast about the Supreme Court: #123. The Supreme Court Episode: Raw Political Power with guest Prof. Tonja Jacobi madnesscafepodcast.buzzsprout.com/1805042/138915…