🔥Telegram İfşa

Content creators who built platforms on Karen Read and the blogger are suddenly silent on the leaked recording, avoiding it, excusing it, or dismissing it. Insisting they’re not biased. If that were true, why dodge it? Looks like they’re waiting for new talking points or a script

Yet another leaked tape, no surprise, the blogger had one of his trademark tantrums and told Karen what most of us wanted to say three years ago: "f*ck off."

👀

While I disagree with their stance on KR and their take on the Waterfall "incident." They weren’t on my bingo card for asking the right questions about the recordings with critical thinking. But credit where it’s due. youtube.com/live/dxQNMJau1…

Imagine the blogger, Bederow, and Bradl all leaning into “Olivia Lambo,” only for it to turn out she never existed. What if they all knew Joe Flipperhead was being catfished and still let him run with it? The thought of a defense team building around a ghost account is too on-brand.

Nothing like Karen sending out a little dog whistle to make sure the message gets out to the cult.

Apparently, women need guidance on how not to be talked to, and the blogger thinks he’s just the guy to teach it.

Filter Little is outraged at an alleged call, no proof, no context, yet defends the blogger who wiretaps, harasses, smears & rallies. Leaves out the recipient of the "call" was still chasing the Colin narrative. Selective outrage at its finest.

For everyone who bought into the narrative: it’s time to pause, look back at what you were told, and ask why the facts never matched the script. Accountability can’t be one-sided. If you questioned the Commonwealth, you should be questioning your creators too.

Curious how Filter Little’s name hasn’t come up among those who heard or shared the recordings. She’s distancing herself from the fallout. As a lawyer with ties to Read, her family, and her defense counsel’s relatives, wouldn’t ethics require disclosure if she knew?

Livestreaming a “walkthrough” of a redacted motion while hinting where to find what’s blacked out is weaponizing leaked evidence the court ruled protected. The same person responsible for the leak is now guiding followers back to it, that’s not commentary, that’s circumvention

At this point, the most basic question isn’t “who’s lying?”, it’s why does someone claiming innocence need a network of creators, leaks, and spin to keep the narrative alive?

When an “innocent” defendant needs a PR handler, coordinates messaging with counsel, shares sensitive material with friends, and actively monitors witnesses’ social feeds, she wasn't never "fighting for her life"; she was managing her brand. youtu.be/RD2nqIHYMP0?si…

Ted resurfaces when there’s a Read narrative to amplify. No word on the leaking grand juror or the secret recording where she said, “Do you know what was on those two phones?” But he’s back to push the “fishing expedition” narrative. Convenient timing or coordinated messaging?

Sounds like impersonating a public official, potential fraud, and a threat to every witness who’s already endured years of public abuse. I hope Hank Brennan presses charges.

The hunter became the bait. Couldn’t script it better. #RevokeHisBail

Documenting his downfall with Proton Mail.