RECAP: ⚾️Astros RL -1.5 (+107)(1U)✖️ If anyone posited Hunter Brown would surrender 6 earned runs against this Guardians lineup, ok. Astros battled back only to lose extra off a grand slam from Hader. What a strange game, I don't share these to waste your time, we've had some

Tomorrow like another (3U) play in the MLB. I don't generally do this. Why not maximize?

➡️Newsletter uploaded: ⚾️Rare (3U) in the MLB, late game ➡️133-90 (59.6%) since 2018, all sports. Nice winner with the Padres (3U) yesterday; 53-35 (60.2%) +24.1U run via the newsletter 3+ months now. More importantly long-term, demonstrated process. sportsdogma.com

How do people evaluate their unit size? I see people on this app saying "I am up 26 units" and they are 8-4 with an average risk of ~50 dollars How does that work exactly?

As you know I am a proponent of kelly criterion; of outcomes, maximizing long term expected value, binary, but parlays, SGPs are ruining everything within this community. And agreed with the latter half.

Just sticking with this tonight, only play for tonight.

Cubs look like they don't even care, this is lackadaisical, again. There is no competitive value in these at bats

➡️Newsletter RECAP: ⚾️Cubs -105 (3U)✖️ That was just an awful performance, Cubs are a team more than capable of making any game competitive, they look disinterested in every aspect, had posited a strong response after game one, liked the pitching matchup cumulatively. Cubs

To a tee, and I know many friends/part of the community always reflect upon this, we have a losing pick, the following day it's a no doubt winner. CC: Cubs - did speak to some about this for today. In any case few positions in tow today

FULL RECAP: ⚾️Mets (game two) -115 (1U)✖️ ➡️Newsletter: ⚾️Padres +114 (2U) ✅✅✅ Main play at sportsdogma.com Newsletter on a 54-36 (60.0%) run, obviously want the sweep, more plays in tow. Tomorrow another upgrade in tow. Padres have contributed +8 units this