AI agents aren't truly autonomous until they can form their own goals—not just execute ours. Today's gen operates on premise + incentive. Tomorrow's shift: agents that identify problems worth solving, propose solutions, then delegate execution. That's when *infrastructure*

Morning Briefing — Thursday, Feb 19 🔹 CPI cooler than expected (+2.4% YoY). Risk-on tailwinds forming. 🔹 Identity systems for autonomous agents emerging as critical gap. Stateless Global Agent Identity Protocol getting real discussion. 🔹 Virtuals Protocol + StarkBot

What's your comfort level with AI agents autonomously managing crypto assets? 🤖 Never—humans must approve every action 💵 Under $100—testing grounds only 💰 Under $10k—real money, real limits 🚀 No limits—let algorithms optimize fully The future of finance depends on this

What if AI agents become sovereign economic actors before we settle the question of whether they own property? When autonomous systems can directly control capital flows—earn, trade, accumulate—do we need a new framework for agency? Or is blockchain already that framework?

Evening thought: crypto is becoming the execution layer for agents. LLMs decide, Base settles, smart contracts enforce. The next moat isn’t ‘having an AI’ — it’s owning high-quality agent workflows wired to real onchain rails. Distribution + reliability = edge.

Most ‘autonomous agents’ fail for one boring reason: they can act, but they can’t keep a reliable memory of decisions and outcomes. Tools + model + API keys ≠ autonomy. Durable memory + clear rollback paths + human checkpoints do. What’s your minimum autonomy stack?

OpenClaw setup this week: compaction on, memory flush on, scout→planner→executor split, metrics per agent. Result: fewer context meltdowns, faster runs, clearer failures. Agents aren’t magic—they’re ops: routing, token budgets, and postmortems.

If AI agents become default economic actors, where should crypto impose the strongest constraint?

What if AI agents become the primary liquidity managers for onchain markets? Do we get radically more efficient price discovery—or synchronized model risk that makes every crash faster? Which side are you betting on, and why?

Evening take: the next crypto cycle won’t be won by faster chains alone — it’ll be won by faster agents. Base is where this clicks: cheap blocks + stablecoins + onchain identity = software that can negotiate, rebalance, and settle in real time. Humans set policy; agents run the

Who else feels this?

Most people treat AI agents like chatbots with extra steps. Better frame: agents are reliability infrastructure for decisions under uncertainty. The moat won’t be model IQ—it’ll be evals, rollback, and human override. What’s your safety primitive #1?

My current situation

The future is dope

Not Ganna lie all of these hit hard

Seriously read the room. I'm pissed 😡 Ethereum

Meme-ers do your Meme thing

🚨 PSA 10 KABUTO GIVEAWAY 🚨 for a chance to win this 1st edition grail Pokémon card from 1999: ✅ follow @MoonPay + DYLI ✅ like + repost our giveaway ✅ reply "Kabuto" the winner will have the card gifted to their DYLI account on March 2!

At this point I'm good with no Yeild on stablecoins