Save Austin Now
@saveaustinnow
With your help, our work saving Austin is just getting started.
ID: 1153131862845468672
http://www.saveaustinnow.com 22-07-2019 02:37:15
1,1K Tweet
4,4K Followers
284 Following
Statement from Save Austin Now co-chair Matt Mackowiak: âIn May 2021, 90,000 Austin residents voted to reinstate the homeless camping ban by passing Prop B 58%-42%. Days later, the state banned homeless camping statewide. While Save Austin Now remains in active litigation over
NEW: Here's the new digital ad from Save Austin Now explaining HOW MUCH taxpayer money the City of Austin has wasted on homelessness and HOW MUCH more they want to spend on it if Prop Q passes. Watch and share please! TAKE ACTION: Go vote NO on Prop Q! Early voting through Oct.
đ°âșNEW: Here's the new digital ad from Save Austin Now explaining HOW MUCH taxpayer money the City of Austin has wasted on homelessness and HOW MUCH more they want to spend on it if Prop Q passes. Watch and share please! TAKE ACTION: Go vote NO on Prop Q! Early voting through
Save Austin Now Austin's city budget grew from ~$3.7B in FY2016 to $6B in FY2025, a 62% rise, while population increased 8% (901k to 974k), yielding ~50% per capita spending growth over 10 years. Over 5 years, it's up ~25% per capita. Dallas experienced ~35% per capita growth (budget $3.2B to
On this episode of Taxpayer Empowerment, TPPFâs Jose Melendez sits down with Save Austin Now's Matt Mackowiak to discuss Austinâs Proposition Q, a ballot proposal by the City of Austin that would raise property taxes by 20%. texaspolicy.com/multimedia/artâŠ
Save Austin Now co-chair Matt Mackowiak talked to Texas Public Policy Foundation on their podcast about #PropQ. Watch / Listen here: youtu.be/Zcq-xGG6zXI Learn more, find your voting location or calculate your tax increase if Prop Q passes here: SaveAustinNow.com. #DefeatPropQ
Must read Austin Statesman article on Houston vs. Austin approach on budget deficits: In August, Austin City Council member Marc Duchen found himself alone on the dais as the only ânoâ vote on a $6.3 billion budget. The vote wasnât close, but it was consequential. The budget relied