Hey Penn BGS congratulate our new Gilliam Fellows Montserrat Arreguín Kyndall Nicholas Kellie Ann Jurado Cullen Lab

Tis true, yet also agree w Emily Hilz, PhD there are a lot of folks I only ‘know’ by their published work (‘kbpw’, we might call it) & can cite their chapter and verse. Our trainees are fully capable of doing that, too, & then they’ll be old and grey

Hey ‘model system’ and fruit fly tweeps, you use a database replete with genomic information; you should know this name - one we stand on the shoulders of Michael Ashburner (1942–2023): Current Biology cell.com/current-biolog…

Getting ready for our Halloween gig: ‘beware the hairy-handed gent, who ran them up in Kent…’

That’s our collective faults. What’s missing is the ‘why’ we chose this and ‘continue to choose’ it. None of our excitement is stated (only moaning about reviewer #3). The inquiry, confronting puzzles, agency in choosing questions, launching mentees, etc

Agreed

Hey Penn BGS ⬇️is for you; go for it!

Of interest Bailey Warder Gabriela Vida Penn BGS

Hey Penn BGS that’s your Prof. Mary Mullins ⬇️

This ⬇️ UPenn CDB UPenn DSRB

Every single one.

Hey Penn BGS This ⬇️ — it’s for you!

Hey trainees Penn BGS, sometimes we faculty forget to say ‘why’ we do this. ⬇️this.

Let me know what questions and insights you uncover as you start to put these methods into practice. 🤓 And PhDs working outside of industry - any other JD "responsibility" insights I've missed?

Hey Penn BGS an industry job-description whisperer helps you here Bailey Warder Gabriela Vida

Hey Penn BGS this ⬇️

This ⬇️ and more Penn BGS #pennbgs4u interacting w/ Josh over these years I saw that every principled position grew from his thinking about ‘what’s best for the trainees’

#sciOptimism Another view is we have agency to change that. As reviewers in obvious ways, and as authors by taking editors to task for allowing such comments influence