Could it be a perceived conflict if the expert sources you quote in that coverage are also lavishly funded by the exact same agenda-driven donor – and you conceal that from the readers? 🤔

Thanks 😊 to all participants and followers of this #GFL panel. It was enlightening in its arguments and energized our common struggle to uncover bad #science in the anti-THR agenda

No es posible saber con tanta certeza si todos los que se abstuvieron de votar están “al menos conformes” con la 4T. Creo que al menos a una enorme proporción simplemente les valió madres.

Learned a bit of Cricket & enjoyed the company 😊

Researchers (specifically young w/out tenure) know that ANYTHING showing harms from #vaping (even if supported by weak or speculative evidence) gets easily & rapidly published.

Nuevos funcionarios prometedores no basta, Gady Zabicky se presentó en 2018 como alguien abierto y progresista, pero acabó sometido a la obsoleta y punitiva política anti-sustancias de AMLO. Urgente cambiar las políticas actuales.

Michael Landl Eu Commission We have a big problem, the fact that this wants to be done all over the world must tell us something…. Who is paying so that there is only vaping “of “high standard” products and only two flavors menthol and tobacco, and regulating the closest thing to tobacco… It is time

Almost Imperceptible difference in cotinine levels with/without vaping. Important limitation: data was collected in 2017-2020. Vaping devices now are overwhelmingly low powered pods emitting far less aerosol => less nicotine absorption.

Pub Peer comment pubpeer.com/publications/2… criticizing a study by Baylor Science misunderstanding "dry puffs" and ignoring costumer usage sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

Ese alegato de Andrés Manuel viene de un estudio de ínfima calidad que hizo COFEPRIS Las 27 sustancias son saborizantes aprobados por el mismo COFEPRIS Estudio inútil, los usuarios no ingieren los líquidos inhalan el aerosol que generan.

De acuerdo, prohibición de #vapedores es una de las políticas mas erradas del gobierno de Andrés Manuel Genera mercado negro, cero control de calidad, cero recaudación. Instituciones de salud en Inglaterra los promueven a fumadores q'no logran dejar de fumar.

Oculta su autoritarismo y crueldad de cuando fue fiscal en California. Procesó padres de menores delincuentes, encarceló gente pobre y de minorías por crímenes menores (poseer 10 gm de droga). Se hizo liberal por oportunismo. Muchos gringos incluso demócratas dudan de ella.

Devastating critique of disinformation on vaping, focuses on formaldehyde scaremongering. open.substack.com/pub/thefirebre…

Our latest review on e-cig emissions (14 studies) is available online frontiersin.org/journals/chemi… Our review supports the harm reduction role of #vapes

“Particles” in exhaled vapes are rapidly evaporating liquid droplets made 98-99% of PG, VG, nicotine and water. Ignorant & disgraceful disinformation to cast them as harmful & comparable to air pollution PM2.5. Cooking aerosols more hazardous to bystanders.

Muy lamentable que Denise Dresser ya no estará en “La Hora de Opinar”. Si este programa sigue así se convertirá en “La Hora de Aplaudir” al poder en turno. Aguas N+ FORO y Televisa: apaciguar a un dictador es callejón sin salida.

Evidence is massive: Sussman, R.A.; Sipala, F.; Emma, R.; Ronsisvalle, S. Aerosol Emissions from Heated Tobacco Products: A Review Focusing on Carbonyls, Analytical Methods, and Experimental Quality. Toxics 2023, 11, 947. doi.org/10.3390/toxics…

Estimate risk = quantify inhalation dose. Candles & incense produced by combustion. Comparable to environmental tobacco smoke, but churches = very large volume spaces + limited exposure time (~1-2 hours) -> dose less than urban indoor & outdoor pollution (exposure 24/7)

Gross disinformation by María Pérez : scare on "metals" omitting reference to dose. Our review of metal studies mdpi.com/2305-6304/10/9… completely demolishes the claim of high levels in vape aerosols. High levels only found in methodologically flawed studies