Excited to hear from Dame Julie Maxton in Sydney tomorrow evening! You can register for the event here: science.org.au/news-and-event…

A real surprise to wake up this morning to see I have been named one of 52 newsmakers for 2023 by the The Sydney Morning Herald, alongside my formidable partner Tracy Chapman Justice For Kathleen Folbigg. It has been a privilege to share my knowledge about #KathleenFolbigg’s case with the public.

On Thursday 14 December at 10am, the Court of Criminal Appeal will hand down judgment in #KathleenFolbigg’s matter. It is hoped that Ms Folbigg will be acquitted, and finally have her name cleared after 24 years.

The judgment in #KathleenFolbigg’s case will be live streamed by the Supreme Court tomorrow. The proceedings begin at 10am. You can access the link on the Supreme Court homepage here: supremecourt.nsw.gov.au

We did it, Kath!

You can vote for a pic of me. When you do you vote for a team of justice warriors & a woman the State egregiously failed. Kath Folbigg served 20 yrs for the murder of her children. She maintained her innocence.Wrongful conviction is the gravest injustice⚖️ smh.com.au/national/nsw/s…

A privilege to be invited to talk about #KathleenFolbigg’s experience. Fantastic presentations by my colleagues. Elated to see the shared concern about #miscarriagesofjustice in our country. Thanks to the International Commission of Jurists QLD and Griffith University Innocence Project for organising!

Time to end prosecution of Julian #Assange: UNSR on freedom of expression Irene Khan UN Special Procedures says, calling on US and UK to end this & drop the charges 🇺🇳 Joining the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, govt & Parliament 🇦🇺 President Biden U.S. Department of Justice ohchr.org/en/press-relea…

I’m extremely humbled to have been involved in overturning a serious miscarriage of justice early in my career. This story also mentions (albeit only briefly) a large team of people who were determined to right a wrong. This is also their story. #KathleenFolbigg

A must read. Striking parallels with #KathleenFolbigg’s case. Very concerning to learn this article is banned in the UK - why the need to silence questions? newyorker.com/magazine/2024/…

The article by Rachel Aviv in the The New Yorker was a great reminder of the importance of solid statistics and seeking advice from ⁦Royal Statistical Society⁩ - United Kingdom · Change.org change.org/p/retrial-for-…

More than 1/5 of sick neonates are found to suffer from genetic conditions. Before accusing nurses (like Lucy Letby) or mothers of murder, genetic causes should be investigated. It is important to cast a wide net on rare gene variants, including those of uncertain significance.

A child at 10: Loses 4 baby teeth a year  Knows the complete date Can name the months of the year in order Can read and understand a paragraph of complex sentences Has developed skills in addition, subtraction Has some  skills in multiplying and division,  And, in Australia,

Kathleen Folbigg details 20 years of horror in compensation bid | Daily Telegraph ⁦Rhanee Rego⁩ ⁦brigid glanville⁩ dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/kathl…

#LucyLetby. Six of the 7 children allegedly murdered had been found to have recognisable causes of death by the pathologist and/or treating consultant and coroner: Child C: Acute pneumonia Child D: pneumonia with acute lung injury Child E: NEC (necrotising enterocolitis) Child

Roger the Policeman The prosecutors had never seen an air embolism before as a cause of death, and neither other experts called to testify. The author of the paper they need their conjectures on said his paper had been misinterpreted. It related to air embolism caused by positive CPAP ventilation.

Roger the Policeman Typos corrected and expanded The prosecution’s main expert - Evans - admitted had never seen an air embolism before as a cause of death, and neither other experts called to testify. The author of the paper they based their conjectures on said his paper had been misinterpreted.

Article considering Lucy Letby's so-called "confession notes". Some distinct parallels here with Kathleen Folbigg's diary entries; very dubious evidentiary value. Why didn't defence call a forensic psychologist to counter the prosecution's narrative? 🤔 theguardian.com/uk-news/articl…

From this article: “So: juries are an essential check against the professional criminal justice apparatus, but they are not the only such check.  Another essential check is the ability of people in the broader public sphere to question the outcome of court processes, including