Pt 21 Virginia’s statement to People magazine that she had suffered abuse at the hands of her husband during their marriage, was made just five days after her last conversation with her ghost writer Amy Wallace. Prior to her statement, Virginia had only ever publicly sung the

Pt 22 In her preface, Amy Wallace continues in her narrative of demonising Robert Giuffre, by stating that his assault of Virginia in January was not without president. Ms Wallace then documents a separate incident in Colorado in 2015 where Robert had been arrested for

Pt 23 Virginia’s Apr 2025 accusations in People magazine, of having suffered domestic abuse during her marriage, gave her two brother’s the perfect platform (following her death) to launch all manner of other accusations against Robert Giuffre, as did the motive of their likely

Pt 24 With Virginia no longer alive and having not recorded any historic acts of domestic violence in her notes written during her last three months, her ‘family’ (identified in The Times article as her brother Sky, her half-brother Danny and their respective wives Amanda &

Pt 25 In The Times article, the so-called ‘family’ claimed that in August 2023 Virginia first broached the subject of divorcing Robert, and that they “talked so many times about her leaving”. Where their fake story is entirely exposed as a mountain of lies, is not only that they

Pt 26 Another major obstacle to the salacious narrative of Virginia’s so-called ‘family’ is that in their article of 1 Jul 2025, The Times also published several pages of Virginia’s so-called ‘diary’ (a collection of notes she made in the last three months or so of her life).

Pt 27 In an article published on 4 Sep 2025 by ABC News, the readers further learn (contrary to claims by Virginia’s so-called ‘family’ of her being subjected to years of domestic abuse) that the final draft of her book gave a “positive portrait of her marriage” to Robert

Pt 28 However, the chosen words and story used by Virginia in her Introduction to her memoir, sets the record straight as to her loving feelings toward her husband; certainly up to 2021, when they had been married for 19 years. In her Introduction she describes how, during a

Pt 1 The face of Prince Andrew in a photograph taken with his family in Leicester Square London on 6 Dec 2000 at the European Premiere of 102 Dalmatians, bears a striking match to his face in Virginia Giuffre’s fake photograph. (Credit to HazNoNuts for this discovery).

Pt 2 Further analysis of the gettyimage confirms that once the height, width and rotation of Prince Andrew’s head is adjusted to match that of the fake photo, the physical characteristics of his face align near perfectly with each other; most notably, his pupils, nostril, mouth,

Pt 3 The only clear difference between the two photos is Prince Andrew’s redeye (which would have been added or removed to one or other photo, as other MSM publications of the fake photo show him without red-eye). Also, in the original photo Prince Andrew has a more curly fringe,

Pt 4 Given the apparent slightly raised eyebrows and top lip in the original photo, the conclusion must be drawn that both the original and fake photos were either taken from different frames within the same camera burst (a rapid sequence of shots), or that further slight

Pt 5 The whereabouts of Ghislaine and Prince Andrew during the evening of 10 Mar 2001, and the early hours of 11 Mar, are now known and corroborated by photographic evidence … Prince Andrew’s head was cut from a photograph taken in Leicester Square London on 6 Dec 2000 at the

Pt 6 It remains only to identify the headless pot-bellied man with his arm seemingly around Virginia’s waste; and the whereabouts of Epstein on 10 Mar 2001. What can be established from Virginia’s fake photo is that her body was superimposed on top of another woman whose arm can

Pt 7 With the mainstream media tripping over themselves to infer the most salacious narrative of any otherwise innocent photo of Prince Andrew, released as part of the Epstein files, even they have (at least for now) steered clear of creating similar such inference from an email

Pt 8 - Conclusion Ghislaine Maxwell was prosecuted on six federal charges stemming from her alleged involvement in recruiting and grooming underage girls for sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004. She was convicted on five counts and acquitted on one. Yet

A Head of Himself Read all the X posts exposing Virginia's manipulation of her fake photo by superimposing the head of Prince Andrew from a photograph taken in London on 6 Dec 2000; and that Ghislaine was at her mother's 80th birthday celebrations outside of London, during the

Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted on five counts including the “Sex trafficking of minors” specifically in regard to Carolyn Andriano, who testified against Ghislaine at her trial. Yet, following Ghislaine's trial, Carolyn told the Daily Mail that she laid the blame of her

Read all the Twitter posts exposing the co-conspirators in the hoax to destroy Prince Andrew. drive.google.com/file/d/1HW2Ic-…

Read of how Virginia Giuffre attempted to destroy the career of an innocent school-bus driver by posting (yet another) fake photo showing her face to be badly bruised, and claiming that the bus had ploughed into her car at 110km per hour, and that she had gone into renal failure