npr.org/2025/10/30/nx-…

Sure. Because calling a President "stupid" and his decision "ridiculous" is a proven effective way to change policy, redirect a President, and stay employed by the time five o'clock rolls around.

No, which is why it would be done some place in the Pacific, as we did in the Cold War--as my paper explained. Again, I'm not advocating for testing or open air testing... but if you want to prevent above ground testing, we should at least have Nevada Test Site ready.

“Defense Priorities for the U.S.–South Korean Alliance” ⁦Heritage Foundation⁩ heritage.org/global-politic…👇Hegseth visits DMZ ahead of talks on U.S. troops in South Korea ⁦Bob Peters⁩ ⁦Wilson Beaver⁩ ⁦Jim Fein⁩ reuters.com/business/aeros…

Great news! Our friends in South Korea demonstrating once again that they are one of America’s most capable and responsible allies. 🇺🇸🇰🇷 heritage.org/global-politic…

Unrealistically destabilizing?

A lot of American think tankers are telling Asian political leaders what is/isn't in their nation's best interests these days...

👀 A predictable consequence to China's "we're going to cut off your head" diplomacy

Weird how The American Conservative continues to publish explicitly non-conservative positions on nukes, particularly so when they are written by people whose backgrounds suggest they are anything but conservative.

Can’t emphasize how big of a story this is for Russia and Iran’s nuclear program — probably the most concrete evidence that Russia is crossing previously-held redlines when it comes to cooperation with Iran in the nuclear domain.

I fully support putting START I back in effect. Both sides can field 6,000 weapons AND we get mutual inspections and verification. Win-win.