The Delhi High Court has reiterated a key principle in trademark law – group companies cannot automatically enforce each other’s IP rights without proper legal title or assignment. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lnkd.in/gmywfRR3 #IntellectualProperty

On July 28, 2025, the Division Bench of Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Bodhisattva Charitable Trust (BCT) and upheld the injunction restraining them from using Mayo Medical Centre Authors: Ranjan Narula and Abhishek Nangia lnkd.in/gCk-KFHV #TrademarkLaw

The Delhi High Court’s ruling marks a significant step in India’s GI jurisprudence, affirming that exclusivity is not always the solution in homonymous disputes. Authors: Rachna Bakhru and Mohandas Konnanath lnkd.in/gTtW6CDe #IntellectualProperty

The Delhi High Court has held that the word “Yatra”, meaning journey or travel in Hindi, is generic and descriptive and cannot be monopolised as trademark for travel services. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Sabia Veqar lexology.com/library/detail… #delhihighcourt #trademarklaw

The Supreme Court rejected Pernod Ricard’s appeal seeking an interim injunction against the use of the mark “LONDON PRIDE” holding that no prima facie case of deceptive similarity was established. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Daleep Kumar lexology.com/library/detail…

The order of the Bombay High Court in Travel Blue Products India Pvt. Ltd. (TBPL) v. Miniso Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd. highlights the delicate line between functionality and aesthetics in design law. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail…

The Delhi High Court recently weighed in on a trademark clash between Cordelia Cruises and Cordelia Inn, examining whether the shared use of “Cordelia” in the hospitality sector could cause customer confusion. Authors: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail…

The Madras High Court recently considered the scope of Section 3(d) and Section 3(e) in a patent appeal (CMA (PT) No.28 of 2023) filed by Amgen Inc. against a pre-grant refusal of their application. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Suvarna Pandey lnkd.in/gTZuq7cT #patent

Atomberg Technologies’ appeal against Luker Electric over its Renesa ceiling fan design has been dismissed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court. Author: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #trademark #ipr #infringement #intellectualproperty #rnaip

The Delhi High Court, in a recent order, declined to restrain Wow Burger from using its mark despite objections by Wow Momo Foods. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #delhihighcourt #intellectualproperty #trademark #ipr #rnaip

The Madras High Court recently dealt with a unique dispute involving claims of trademark and copyright infringement over the design of a flag. Author: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #madrashighcourt #trademark #intellectualproperty #infringement #ipr #rnaip

he Delhi High Court, in Tablets India Ltd v. Spey Medicals Pvt Ltd, underscored that strict adherence to procedural timelines is vital in trademark opposition proceedings. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #delhihighcourt #trademark #ipr

From all of us at RRNA IP, we send heartfelt greetings for a bright and prosperous Diwali. A season of reflection, rejuvenation, and profound joy. May the radiance of the lamps illuminate your lives, bringing the deepest form of happiness and abundant success. #HappyDiwali2025

The Delhi High Court held that right to cross-examination, though fundamental, is not absolute, it must be exercised diligently and at the appropriate stage. Author: Ranjan Narula lexology.com/library/detail… #NaturalJustice #CrossExamination #PatentLitigation #IPLaw

In a recent ruling on transnational trademark protection, the Delhi High Court’s Division Bench considered the principles of territoriality and goodwill. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail…

In the complex world of Standard Essential Patent (SEP) disputes, especially those involving FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) terms, the role of confidentiality clubs has become indispensable. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Rachna Bakhru lexology.com/library/detail…

The judgment lays down an important principle, trademark protection extends beyond the exact words or visuals to the distinctive idea or concept behind the mark. Author: Ranjan Narula rnaip.com/wow-momo-wins-… lexology.com/library/detail… #delhihighcourt #trademark #ipr #rnaip

The Bombay High Court’s ruling in the “DOCTOR EXTRA SOFT” case reaffirms that equity and concealment cannot coexist, any injunction obtained through suppression of facts is destined to be struck down. Author: Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail…

The Bombay High Court’s ruling in the “DOCTOR EXTRA SOFT” case reaffirms that equity and concealment cannot coexist, any injunction obtained through suppression of facts is destined to be struck down. Author: Mohandas Konnanath lnkd.in/gpusQdBZ

The Division bench of the Delhi High Court has delivered a decisive ruling in favour of Mankind Pharma, holding that Brinton’s mark ACNESCAR is deceptively similar to the registered mark ACNESTAR. Authors: Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath lexology.com/library/detail… #rnaip