Congratulations on your new Center for Constructive Disagreement. I have two questions:
1. Are you planning to do something to address the rise of denunciation, demonization, public shaming, reputational smearing, attempted ostracism and censorship in academia? Charity starts…

Wow. From 2004. Jacobson saw it so clearly.

Calling The First Amendment and Bad Legal Takes. Is this true?

Expel: Trespassing & harassment.

Now if only academia would get better...

No evidence that Republicans believe more conspiracy theories than do Democrats. tl;dr: 'To each their own.'
link.springer.com/article/10.100…

Did you commit assault or vandalism?
wsmv.com/2024/04/05/sus…

Dark, yet descriptive. & the convo below gets darker.

My house just shook. 10 min ago. At first I thought it was a big truck rumbling, but it was worse than that. Its also windy, and I thought it was a gust. But there never was a gust like that in 24 years here.

Just got independent confirmation. This happened. It is accurately described in the tweet & clips below. In completely unrelated news, the U.S. House is investigating Rutgers for pervasive antisemitism.
northjersey.com/story/news/edu…

Remember when the Grievance Studies Sting was widely derided as completely uninformative by most of academia? Read the whole thread, it is...rich with toxic lunacy.

'we discourage using the term implicit in reference to bias. Use of the term implicit is just too flexible and inconsistent to ensure conceptual precision.'
Sounds like me, right? Wrong! That is Bert Gawronski, who has published a massive amount in this area. That, and more like…