Top AI auditing/security tools on the market rn: - Octane Security - Olympix - QuillAudits | Web3 Security 🥷 - ... which ones did I miss?

Regulatory requests: “show test results.” Teams show coverage. We need mutation logs—not vanity metrics.

Postmortems always blame missing tests. Mutation would’ve flagged those.

A 100% coverage badge is a metric. Mutation failure is a warning. Which one will stop an exploit?

Excited to share that I’ll be speaking at Ethereum NYC: NextFin Summit on August 12 2025, in New York. Looking forward to conversations that push forward the adoption of blockchain technologies, and to connect with builders, finance professionals, and innovators shaping the

Your last test failure—was it meaningful, or just a syntax error? Drop your spiciest test failure story. 👇

If your test suite never fails, it’s not because your code is safe. It’s because your assumptions are unchecked.

Ethereum's promise to rally 30% against Bitcoin? Not so fast. Let's remember the devils in the 'technical momentum'. Builders, be trailsblazers, head towards sustainable smart contract platforms. And mind the momentum hype. cointelegraph.com/news/ethereum-…

In 2018, Bulgaria sold 213.5k BTC. Now, it'd wipe out their public debt. Implication? Short-term gains often undermine potential long-term prizes in crypto. Governments, be patient, or risk such a billion-dollar missed opportunity. cointelegraph.com/news/bulgaria-…

Audits take days. Mutation testing takes seconds. Why are budgets still skewed?

BNB Chain's target for 5k swaps per second? It doesn't hold back, teasing support for 20k transactions per second. For builders, it's tempting, but remember the limits of on-chain scalability. Good luck matching ambition with implementation, BNB. cointelegraph.com/news/bnb-chain…

Most DApps aren’t insecure because of zero-days. They’re insecure because the team never simulated failure. Smart contract security isn’t failing at the exploit layer; it’s failing at the architectural layer. We’re seeing billion-dollar protocols treat security like a

Weak tests don’t show up as red. They show up as green—and exploitable. Mutation testing flips the smart contract security model from defensive to adversarial. Here’s the difference: ✅ Traditional testing says: “Does this code work?” 🧪 Mutation testing asks: “Do our tests

What's your mutation testing stack? Does it plug into CI or sit on the shelf?

Security that waits until audit day is already too late. The PR is where the vulnerability starts. Not in prod. Not in staging. Not in the auditor’s PDF. Yet most teams still treat pull requests like a to-do item, not a threat vector. They run linter checks, wait for CI to go

Your CI should simulate an attacker, not a QA analyst.

Tools are only useful if they break your code. Build UI that celebrates failure.

Exploit news often reads like a surprise, but all exploits start as green CI runs.

Biz ops brag about uptime. Not security. But mutation test failures = proactive uptime defense.

Two auditors. Zero red flags. One $44M exploit. This wasn’t an edge case. It was a logic bomb hiding in plain sight—one every protocol carrying ERC20 approvals is vulnerable to. What happened? – A permission was granted in createLockedCampaign() – It wasn’t revoked in