Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile
Mathews J. Nedumpara

@nedumparaj

Advocate Supreme Court/ High Courts of Bombay and Kerala.

ID: 1014054950249418752

linkhttp://Nedumpara.com calendar_today03-07-2018 07:55:15

88 Tweet

977 Followers

40 Following

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

youtu.be/f7xAu7yYhLE?si… Burn Law Reports to Save Judiciary – Watch this video where i have argued an important constitutional issue without citing any judgements which serve the dual purpose of saving courts time and greater clarity Part-1

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

youtu.be/9tr9Dc-TEu8?si… Burn Law Reports to Save Judiciary – Watch this video where i have argued an important constitutional issue without citing any judgements which serve the dual purpose of saving courts time and greater clarity. Part -2

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Letter addressed to the Chief Justice asking for the constitution of a bench in the light of an auction purchaser who had obtained a property worth 38 crore for half of its market value in a fraudulent auction under the SARFAESI Act taking forceful possession of the property

Letter addressed to the Chief Justice asking for the constitution of a bench in the light of an auction purchaser who had obtained a property worth 38 crore for half of its market value in a fraudulent auction under the SARFAESI Act taking forceful possession of the property
Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

youtu.be/rS9k_k-PbZ0?si… When the Supreme Court itself justifies Magistrates passing orders in violation of the principles of natural justice, what can an MSME do? In our constitutional scheme the courts and the Supreme Court in particular are the guardians of the rights and

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mathews J Nedumpara 4th Feb 2026 Legislation may not protect lawyers from physical attacks, but that is no reason no law should be made to protect lawyers from attacks — physical and otherwise — from police, their clients' opponents, and even from judges. The brutal attack on

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Supreme Court applies different standards when it comes to correcting its own mistakes. In the case of A.R. Antulay, a 7-judge Constitution Bench set aside the judgment of a 5-judge Constitution Bench directing the High Court Judge to conduct a trial, holding that the said

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

youtu.be/_n0ymf4RtJk?si… The Supreme Court applies different standards when it comes to correcting its own mistakes. In the case of A.R. Antulay, a 7-judge Constitution Bench set aside the judgment of a 5-judge Constitution Bench directing the High Court Judge to conduct a trial,

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mathews J Nedumpara Definition of PIL PIL is a mechanism evolved by the elite lobby of lawyers and judges, primarily in Delhi, whereby they enact laws behind the backs of the people of this country under the guise of framing guidelines and annul laws enacted by Parliament —

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mathews J Nedumpara 10th Feb 2026. 98205 35428. Definition of Precedent in India:Goat is a dog! If in a case between A and B the majority of four judges out of five holds that a goat is a dog because both have four legs, two eyes, two ears that manifestly erroneous decision

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mathews J Nedumpara 10th Feb 2026. 98205 35428. Why in India Goat is a dog is a valid precedent If in a case between A and B the majority of four judges out of five holds that a goat is a dog because both have four legs, two eyes, two ears that manifestly erroneous decision

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

*Mathews J. Nedumpara* 11th Feb 2026 *A judgment of the Supreme Court, whether rendered in personam or in rem, operates as a binding precedent under Article 141 if the Court has evolved a new principle where none existed or has reaffirmed an existing one—and otherwise not.

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mathews J Nedumpara 12th Feb 26 98205 35428 The need for transparency in the judiciary is greater today than at any time before, and the fireman’s lamentation "Mahatma Gandhi jal raha hai" resonates in the ears of the common man of this country. Video recording of court

Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mathews J Nedumpara 12th Feb 26 98205 35428 The need for transparency in the judiciary is greater today than at any time before, and the fireman’s lamentation "Mahatma Gandhi jal raha hai" resonates in the ears of the common man of this country. Video recording of court

Mathews J Nedumpara 
12th Feb 26
98205 35428 

The need for transparency in the judiciary is greater today than at any time before, and the fireman’s lamentation "Mahatma Gandhi jal raha hai" resonates in the ears of the common man of this country. Video recording of court
Mathews J. Nedumpara (@nedumparaj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mathews J Nedumpara 98205 35428 14th Feb 2026 Ignorantia judicis est calamitas innocentis. (The ignorance of the judge is the calamity of the innocent.) It is a fundamental principle of law that in any suit or proceeding involving substantial questions of law as to the