Congratulations Nicole!!!!

An update from my prior discussion of the Starbucks 10(j) injunction NLRB case after the Supreme Court's decision today will be posted soon on The Conversation U.S.. A link to come.

Justice Jackson: "I am loath to bless this aggrandizement of judicial power where Congress has so plainly limited the discretion of the courts" and "clearly intends for the expert agency it has created to make the primary determinations about...merits." supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…

Here is the update The Conversation U.S. discussing the Supreme Court's decision today involving NLRB v. Starbucks on standards a court must consider to issue an injunction to return to status quo while proceedings on the merits continue. theconversation.com/supreme-court-…

Needs lots and lots of likes!!!!

Is the NLRB really unconstitutional as an agency that has existed since 1935 to address labor rights of workers? One court says so. But really is this where we are going? Did the law change or the courts change in 90 years and what is really behind this? jacobin.com/2024/07/spacex…

Was the Supreme Court’s recent Starbucks decision part of a broader plan aimed at dismantling NLRB as an effective agency with expertise in protecting labor rights and placing more power in the hands of non-expert judges? I say yes. Thoughts? theregreview.org/2024/08/01/gre…

If reforms come from Congress, 1. Debunk new strategies asserting constitutional and court challenges to NLRB authority and expertise (do same for OSHA, EEOC and DOL), 2. Create broader NLRB remedial authority, and 3. Reduce delays from voting selection to first cbas under NLRA.

Prof. Michael Z. Green (Michael Z. Green) in The Regulatory Review on how the Starbucks v. McKinney case will affect the National Labor Relations Board. hubs.li/Q02Lk4Z20

Another Texas federal district court decision creating a ban (this time nationwide) in stopping a federal agency in its efforts to protect workers rights. Is this how these challenges should be handled? No other jurisdictions to bring nationwide halts? abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/f…

Americans know: It’s #BetterInAUnion ✊

New Gallup Poll Shows That Americans’ Approval Of Labor Unions Remains At Its Highest Level Since the 1960s huffpost.com/entry/american… Dave Jamieson

Relaxing on Labor Day is a a long-established tradition, but its origins are often overlooked. Professor Michael Z. Green (Michael Z. Green) spoke with @WalletHub about the beloved holiday and how it translates to today's workforce. hubs.li/Q02N3_Cf0

I hope you all are having a great Labor Day. A reporter captured my thoughts on the value of using this day to thank organized labor for things all workers take for granted and some of my favorite labor? songs!fortworthreport.org/2024/08/31/fro…

So proud to have NLG and ELLSA students Texas A&M School of Law host union leaders and labor organizers from CWA UFCW TWU Association of Professional Flight Attendants IBEW today in honor of Labor Day week

Happy to provide this discussion about future of labor law questions and especially after recent Senate vote that stopped reappointment of National Labor Relations Board Chair.

Interesting to say Humphreys Executor is still good while allowing NLRB member to be terminated without cause. The NLRB chair is always chosen by the President. But allowing terminating just a member to proceed it seems like Humphreys was rejected here. news.bloomberglaw.com/product/blaw/b…

Not surprising today Court unanimously rejects special test for Title VII claims. And not surprising Justice Thomas separately sources Harvard AA race case again joined by Justice Gorsuch. But future may be Thomas attempt to stop McDonnell test. Get ready! cbsnews.com/amp/news/supre…