
Meta-Psychology
@meta_psy
OA journal w/o APC. Open Peer Review, transparent editorial process. Publishes everything Meta in Psy: meta-science, meta-analysis, file-drawers, methods...
ID: 999975127071805451
https://open.lnu.se/index.php/metapsychology 25-05-2018 11:27:03
611 Tweet
3,3K Takipçi
96 Takip Edilen

“A meta-analytic approach to evaluating the explanatory adequacy of theories” is now published in Meta-Psychology! Corresponding author: Alejandrina Cristia (@?) open.lnu.se/index.php/meta…

Really, really proud of this one, to be honest Tldr: How do we get a better window into reality? By standing on the shoulders of ever growing giants of course! Massive thanks also to the wonderfully constructive reviewers, truly a great journey at Meta-Psychology

On several occasions I've asked for rejection decision letters with anonymous reviewers to be made public and forwarded to Meta-Psychology and Collabra: Psychology only to receive back some baffling responses from respectable editors. Below are a few of those:

As editor of an OA journal that desperately wants libraries to send us $$ so we can stop charging APCs, this story makes me 😞. And frustratingly, bc we’re Collabra: Psychology & not a Nature jrnl, I bet it wouldn’t matter even if our impact factor went up (we’ll get a new one tomorrow).

Now Franck Ramus (compte déserté) about his personal experiences with replication failures in studies on dyslexia, weaving together the two themes of the meeting . 'Here is a picture you never see in a scientific publication'. Impressive and funny talk about resisting pressures to p-hack. #DBfest


Hi Meta-Psychology, we discussed the "Evaluating the Replicability of Social Priming Studies" (psyarxiv.com/dwg9v/) manuscript at our ReproducibiliTea meeting, and we summarized our thoughts in an open peer-review. Hope you find it useful! docs.google.com/document/d/1nC…

New submission Meta-Psychology: “Means to valuable exploration: II. How to explore data to modify existing claims and create new ones” by Höfler et al.(@?). Participate in open peer review here: psyarxiv.com/r5gmy



“Four Failures to Demonstrate that Scarcity Magnifies Preference for Familiarity” by @_stephanoplis is now published in Meta-Psychology! open.lnu.se/index.php/meta…

“Z-curve 2.0: Estimating Replication Rates and Discovery Rates” by František Bartoš is now published in Meta-Psychology! open.lnu.se/index.php/meta…



Pretty happy to be able to update this with an "Out now in Meta-Psychology" open.lnu.se/index.php/meta… I've been worried about measurement reliability issues for a while. But, this reliability heterogeneity thing, it's got me more worried. Especially when we ignore it...

Computational repro checks is probably the most important thing we ( Lucija Batinovic ) do at Meta-Psychology

Your occasional reminder that the peer review process at Meta-Psychology Meta-Psychology is not only the most transparent in the field, it is also the most constructive and civilised. (COI disclosure: I am a member of the Advisory Board and Reproducibility Team at this journal.)


Interested in replication research? Consider writing a commentary for the next special issue in Meta-Psychology, which will publish critiques of the article "Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size"! (full call text in image)


Join our conference on Open Science and Reproducibility. Keynote by Daniël Lakens and Anne Scheel, with Nullius In Verba live on stage at the record shop / “folkölscafé” (bar) Mono. Does the fake code make you cringe? Then you will love the replication games! URL below.

