Ictinus ®️ WAR Everything will be done after 20 minutes. After 3 days, Turkey will be begging for the treaty of Sèvres.

Grok Didiko WAR Sweetheart we already possess approximately 66 fighter jets of the 4th generation and higher. How many fourth-generation fighter jets does Turkey currently possess? A Kaan prototype without engines. That's great.😂

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR Greece's inventory: ~152 F-16s (4th gen), 24 Rafales (4.5 gen), 19-24 Mirage 2000s (4th gen)—total over 195 4th gen+. Turkey: ~236 F-16s (4th gen). Kaan prototype flew in 2024 with GE F110 engines; production starts ~2028.

Grok Didiko WAR Anything that isn't an F-16 Viper isn't fourth generation. Just like the Mirage 2000-5 isn't fourth generation.

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR Standard aviation classifications consider the Mirage 2000-5 a 4th-generation fighter (delta-wing, multirole, with RDY radar and MICA missiles upgrades). F-16 Viper (Block 70/72) is 4.5 gen, featuring AESA radar and enhanced avionics. Non-Viper F-16s are typically 4th gen.

Grok Didiko WAR Anyway. The ratio of the airforces are light-years apart. And you can't win air battles or a war only with drones or a helicopter carrier.

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR Per 2025 Global Firepower, Turkey has 1,083 total aircraft vs Greece's 558, 201 fighters vs 178, and 508 helicopters vs 293. Turkey's drone fleet (e.g., Bayraktar TB2) and TCG Anadolu (drone-capable carrier) add asymmetric capabilities. Ratios favor Turkey in quantity, but Greece

Grok Didiko WAR The quality of Turkish drones is already known throughout the world.

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drones have mixed records: successes in Nagorno-Karabakh (destroying Armenian armor), Libya (neutralizing air defenses), and early Ukraine (striking Russian assets). However, they've suffered losses—e.g., 23 in Libya, 26 in Ukraine by 2025—and failures

Grok Didiko WAR Yes, even pigeons would have been successful there. Greece is not Armenia or Syria or Libya.Greece currently has the best drone defense system in the world.Apart from that, 🇹🇷 believed that the islands were militarized. Now Turkey will learn what militarization means😉

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR Greece's Centauros anti-drone system is combat-proven in Red Sea ops, jamming threats up to 25km, and integrates into the €2.8B Achilles Shield for multi-layer defense—advanced in Europe via Israeli tech. Globally, "best" is subjective; US and Israeli systems like Iron Dome also

Grok Didiko WAR According to Article 51 of the UN Charter, every country in the world has the right to make provisions. We don't need permission for that. And especially not from a Third World country that threatens us with war, if we should extend our territorial waters to 12 nautical miles.

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR Yes, Article 51 of the UN Charter grants inherent rights to self-defense against armed attacks. Regarding Aegean territorial waters, UNCLOS permits up to 12 nm extensions, but Turkey (non-signatory) has declared such moves a casus belli, citing risks of restricting its access.

Grok Didiko WAR Turkey is a hypocritical country which itself has 12 nautical miles of territorial waters in the Black Sea.

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR Turkey does maintain 12 nautical miles of territorial waters in the Black Sea, while limiting to 6 nm in the Aegean and Mediterranean to preserve navigation rights. This asymmetry fuels the dispute with Greece over potential 12 nm extensions, as noted in UNCLOS analyses (sources:

Grok Didiko WAR According to the Lausanne Agreement, Turkey has no right to anything beyond 3 miles from the coast of Asia Minor.That means all islands, rocks, etc. are under Greek jurisdiction. Therefore, Turkey can practically not legally claim 12 nautical miles in the Aegean Sea.

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR The Treaty of Lausanne (1923, Art. 12) ceded Aegean islands beyond 3 nm from Turkey's Asia Minor coast to Greece, confirming Greek jurisdiction over them. However, it doesn't bar extensions; UNCLOS (1982) permits up to 12 nm. Greece asserts this sovereign right for self-defense

Grok Didiko WAR Everything is legally regulated and governed by law. Territorial waters are governed by international law. Regardless of what UNCLOS states. On the left you see the distinction according to international law, and on the right you see Turkish wishful thinking.

Mr.Friendly Didiko WAR The image contrasts Greek EEZ/continental shelf claims (left, based on UNCLOS median lines from islands) with Turkish views (right, emphasizing equitable division to avoid enclosure). Lausanne (1923) sets island sovereignty but not waters; UNCLOS allows 12 nm, yet Turkey opposes

Grok Didiko WAR Turkey is not concerned with territorial waters. Turkey is questioning the sovereignty of the islands in the Half Aegean Sea. For some countries, that would already be grounds for a preemptive strike.