Mark R. Weaver
@MarkRWeaver
Author of "A Wordsmith's Work." Also media law attorney, crisis communications adviser, adjunct professor, prosecutor.
With God all things are possible.
ID:14836546
http://linktr.ee/MarkRWeaver 19-05-2008 19:01:24
29,2K Tweets
11,5K Followers
997 Following
Thank you #GSMCON2024 for having me back again to speak. 650+ people in the audience and we did a fun romp through First Amendment and Social Media with a close look at the new SCOTUS case. I will post the new online tool that helps agencies apply that case sometime next week.
I’m always so grateful when the social media pros at #GSMCON2024 invite me back to speak. Today I spoke on the First Amendment and the new SCOTUS case. I also rolled out an online tool I wrote to help agencies apply the SCOTUS test.
Educational & actionable insights from Mark R. Weaver on how #SocialGov can navigate the legal landscape as he breaks down current court cases including the latest Supreme Court ruling on how the First Amendment governs #SocialMedia comments. #GSMCON2024
I was speaking at a closed client meeting in Arizona last week so I didn’t take a photo. But I did take this photo the next day! #AntelopeCanyon
Reporter claims Judge Dan Hawkins has a legal outlook on something and that his opponents don't share that outlook. But it's not Hawkins' outlook - it's black letter law from the Supreme Court.
Shouldn't the news be that these other justices are flouting Supreme Court precedent? 🤔
I was embedded with “anti-war” activists yesterday for The Free Press when they started chanting “death to Israel” and “death to America” in Farsi.
Many were beaming and clapping as they shouted beneath their N95s.
Earlier this afternoon, Free Press journalist Olivia Reingold was at a conference in Chicago for a story on how far-left activists are planning to disrupt the DNC, when news broke that Iran had just launched drones and missiles heading toward Israel.
The crowd started chanting
Reporter claims Judge Dan Hawkins has a legal outlook on something and that his opponents don't share that outlook. But it's not Hawkins' outlook - it's black letter law from the Supreme Court.
Shouldn't the news be that these other justices are flouting Supreme Court precedent? 🤔