Today on TheHillOpinion: Guns are not just for conservative white men. My title was: "The Unrecognized Diversity of Guns in America" thehill.com/opinion/civil-…

There's a lot of shifting and reprioritizing going on this year for LGO operations. There will be very little posting here over the first half of the year. The most important work we can do is deeper than this. Hang in there. Will be back to this channel soon enough.

Guns in America: 14 years of study summarized in 900 words. Please like/retweet + have a look at & share this essay using the social media links on the article page so The Conversation and Wake Forest University can track the metrics. theconversation.com/guns-in-americ… via The Conversation U.S.

I won't be commenting here on current events. The problem with deeper work is that there is never a good time to do it. There is always something that the liberal community can be upset about that everyone in the community wants addressed - and every person has a different gate

A segment from the upcoming work on The Myth of Law's Supremacy: “The tendency to conceive of the shared vision of a specific historical community as the universal experience of a transcendental subject can be observed in every field of cultural production. Such fields appear as

Both Liberal Gun Owners ® and David Yamane are quoted in this article in The French rag Liberation. liberation.fr/international/… Google Translation: "I went to buy a gun": Faced with insecurity since Trump's return, Democrats are arming themselves As feelings of insecurity have soared

Evidence without the counter-balancing evidence (on the other side of the coin) is not evidence that real problem-solvers should be interested in. This kind of partial evidence, however, seems to be very appealing to people with personal, professional, or political motivations.

After a seven-year-long review, I have come to the conclusion that there is enough evidence already in existence in gun violence studies to show that law and policy, as phenomena, possess a continuous fundamental ineffectiveness towards the problems that the associated legal

Does the academic / research culture skew the data associated with how the law / policy affects gun-related negatives? Yes. 100%. They do this as a matter of course. Is the academic / research culture skewing the data on the actual occurrences of gun-related negatives? No, they

As it pertains to known scholar-induced mythologies like Keeley's Myth of The Noble Savage: "The difference between Archeologist Lawrence Keeley’s experience and my own? I am coming into the life-cycle of the myth that penetrates law and policy prior to the effort required to

On living in a "post-truth" era... Humans and human societies have been running on mythologies, stories, and dogma for a long long time. There's nothing new about humans choosing self-soothing belief over the hassle of facts. There's no such thing as "post-truth", really. We are

We'll be starting a substack in the next few months to consolidate posting and publications.

Still in the research pain-cave. But here’s a nugg: Much of the sentiment of those who ardently support gun control measures are irrelevant as it pertains to real-world improvements with gun-related problems. Anyone with sense understands the math: if you reduce American gun

An enjoyable break in the research dungeon that I'm in. Joining Rob Pincus for a little segment on the MP5 and MP5 clones. youtube.com/watch?v=juiDVs…

We get a lot of sour reactions from "progressives", merely because we deal with the subject of guns. It's constant. And what you are really seeing there is a sub-culture of absolutists who just want the entire topic of guns to go away. In reality, all LGO501c4 does is to give a