🔥Telegram İfşa

"One of the most transformative technologies of the next half-century is on our doorstep" -Prof David Awschalom (@UChicagoIME) on #QuantumTechnology h/t Crain's Chicago Business: chicagobusiness.com/opinion/chicag… #QuantumComputing #Uchicago #QuantumPhysics

My university The University of Chicago continues to be an Economics giant. Paul Romer, an alumnus, wins share of Nobel Prize. Congrats! news.uchicago.edu/story/economis… 91 scholars associated with the university have received Nobel Prizes so far. 30 of them in economics. UChicago Economics

Pioneering #UChicago mathematician, Prof. Gregory Lawler, has been awarded the prestigious Wolf Prize for his work in probability. Join us in congratulating Prof. Lawler on receiving this honor! ms.spr.ly/6015TBU4T

Can't watch Badgers on TV with their shorts looking like white shorts sagging showing red underwear.

.@DirtyUndees Short answer. My work first introduced time series modeling to quality control for more effective process monitoring.

Best #espn commentators. Heroes of the Storm. My new favorite sport.

Next Bachelor. Who will get the rose?

I hope Pharoah doesn't win so that a generation of children will not misspell in their reports of ancient Egypt.

.TIME Aug 3 Time article states "a mathematical impossibility." Totally wrong. Great example of innumeracy.

Implications on the statistics profession? thetimesgazette.com/mit-researcher…

Computer Scientists and Mathematicians Are Stunned by This Chicago Professor’s New Proof chi.mg/1ToCJ4P

2016 World Series, "Analytics Throwdown." Whose models are better?

.Quanta Magazine on how a #UChicago mathematician proved the "impossible": that two infinities are the same size ow.ly/OYLk30fbW2F

Alumni Amy and Richard Wallman give $75 million to support Chicago Booth: bit.ly/2yHRNX0

Congratulations to #ChicagoBooth prof Richard H. Thaler (Richard H Thaler), 2017 #NobelPrize laureate in Economic Sciences! x.com/NobelPrize/sta…

.Chicago Booth Prof. Richard Thaler (Richard H Thaler) wins #NobelPrize: bit.ly/2xtwyae

The major finding is: ”The forecasting accuracy of ML forecasting methods is lower than the worst of statistical ones while the accuracy of more than half the ML methods is lower than a random walk”. journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…

ML methods can't even beat out naive forcast. Statisticians need to do more studies like this to show at times the Emperor (ML) has no clothes. journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…