Reuters
@Reuters
Top and breaking news, pictures and videos from Reuters. For more breaking business news, follow @ReutersBiz. Our new daily podcast is here: https://t.co/KO0QFy0d3a
20-03-2007 17:46:05
1,1M Tweets
25,7M Followers
1,2K Following
Society Reviews Reuters Since 1905 'The Court went on to determine in Jacobson that a state may require vaccination if the board of health deems it necessary for public health or safety.' See 'Jacobson v Massachusetts'. People that don't want their poison are in for the fight of their lives. Buckle up.
Mormon Libertarian @WakeUpHerd Society Reviews Reuters That case (above) is unconstitutional therefore NULL and VOID.
All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. ~ Marbury vs Madison. Source: 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)
American West Indies Research and Trading Company @WakeUpHerd Society Reviews Reuters And the SCOTUS has never had the 'final' say on the Constitutionality of a law. It is up to the people to not consent and for juries to nullify.