Massive congratulations to Linda Zajkiewicz, LLB student at Groningen Law, for winning the Best Advocate General award at the #ELMC! @Groningen_EULaw

Shifting gears after a wonderful workshop Centre for Competition Policy about rethinking #antitrust and #competitionlaw. Looking forward to talking about my research in US constitutional history Constitutional Law and Politics Working Group EUI Law Department.

New paper on Neo-Brandeisian antitrust! My argument is twofold: 1st, Neo-B reform requires change of methodology, not antitrust goals. 2nd, it requires new legisl/admin rules, applying existing antitrust law is unlikely to succeed. Open access here: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…

Fully agree, the criticism of Fiona Scott Morton's appointment is nonsense.

The EU Court of Justice rightly set aside the GC's decision in CK Telecoms (C-376/20). 2nd-guessing EU Competition's economic expertise is not the task of judicial review. Check out my op-ed EU Law Live: eulawlive.com/the-virtue-of-… @Groningen_EULaw Groningen Law #competitionlaw #mergers

In the current Issue (EP. Vol. 8, 2023, No 1) What... Should Have Said ‘Preface: Rewriting Landmark Judgments of the European Court of Justice: A New Project for European Papers and a New Way of ‘Doing EU Law’’ by Justin Lindeboom (Justin Lindeboom) europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/p…

NEW: America is a rich country. Britain is a poor country with one wealthy region. People love to compare the UK to Mississippi, but it’s far more informative to look at UK subnationally, too. London ranks fairly well, the rest of the country does not 👉 ft.com/content/e5c741…

New blog with Ina Opartyová on the gender effects of #EU trade policy in light of the EU's Gender Action Plan III. FTAs with New Zealand, Canada, and Chile show how gender-sensitivity can inform trade policy, but more can and should be done. Groningen Law @Groningen_EULaw

The Autonomy of EU Law, Legal Theory and European Integration - our new Special Section in European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration with Justin Lindeboom is now available and fully open access. Many thanks to all esteemed contributors! europeanpapers.eu/en/news/europe…

An unlikely photo. At Oxford no less. ⁦Barbie⁩

A short comment on the EU Court of Justice's judgment in C-315/22 Gabel Industria Tessile. More on horizontal direct effect of directives and national procedural autonomy! EU Law Live eulawlive.com/op-ed-another-…

Thrilled to announce that my book ‘Legislative Authority and Interpretation in the European Union’ will be published by OUP Law in mid-July. global.oup.com/academic/produ… More information about the book and its argument in the tweets below 1/9

Great to be UCL Faculty of Laws for the Cambridge-UCL Competition Law and Policy Workshop: A Foresight Approach. Ioannis Lianos Deni Mantzari Oles Andriychuk 🇺🇦 Julian Nowag Stavros Makris Faculty of Law UCL Centre for Law, Economics & Society (CLES)

Fully agree. Any other outcome would have deviated from decades of case law on standing. Mixing up admissibility with substance (or aims as you write) is just plain wrong.

More than 2500 people have accessed this paper in six months…. Wow, unexpected! I’ve been saying these things for years (first in 1996, at the EurLRev). Nice! The Primacy of EU Law: Interpretive, not Structural europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/p…

Real Dynamic Competition: "Moore's law in chips that enabled the smaller, faster, cheaper paradigm [...] only proved true because competitors to Intel, like Advanced Micro Devices, forced Intel and others to reduce costs and innovate over time to remain competitive"

"Long, boring, and turgid, even by the normal opaque standards of ECJ judgments" is how Spencer Waller described the EU Court of Justice's Google Shopping judgment. Vaszilia Bartosova and I analysed the judgment for EU Law Live: eulawlive.com/weekend-editio… @Groningen_EULaw Groningen Law

Looking forward!