In literally no discipline ever, no. Mozarts Requiem is great, otherwise he’s rightly called an “empty genius” sometimes. Bach is without any doubt the greatest and most genius composer of all time.

Is there an Oriental Orthodox Bible Commentary?

Btw. The Distinction between Protestants and Evangelicals is also helpful for us Catholics if we want to address those groups. Traditional Protestants are in parts closer to us than to Evangelicals. It’s good to use this distinction to address each group differently.

Wow Orthodox Pikachu☦ is that true? :0

On the Loving Sacrifice of Christ: "To stay close to the parable from the Gospel (Luke 19), we will adhere to the primary meaning: that the Lord Jesus has received the kingdom in eternal life—for himself and for all his chosen ones. That is why he speaks so comfortingly:

This is a quote that has been attributed to the most honourable Dr. Johann Eck for a long time now. Why is this quote not a serious problem for us Catholics? The short answer is: Because it is a fabrication – and here is why: 1. Argument from Historicity That this quote is not

Lutherans? I like But Luther? I don’t like

Dispensationalism

Baumann einfach der größte Macher. 🥰

Who is the funniest video creator on Theology, and why is it How to be Christian?

Why is it easier to get a PDF from a random book from an English Mystik from the 17th century, than a German or English translation of Gerhard’s Loci theologici? 😭

In the last few days I got asked for my thoughts on a topic on Dr. Eck two times. That made me happy. 😇

Fact of the Day: Because of Dr. Ecks condemnation, the other Catholics also took a stricter stance against the documents from the Coloquium of Regensburg.

Broooooo Gerhard crushes the Chiliasts so bad. 😭 In his Loci on the Consumption of the World and Hell, he first shows what absurd heresies some Chiliasts believe and the way he refutes them is brutal. No way anyone can read Gerhard and be Chiliasts afterwards. 🤯

It’s so funny to me, that Gerhard takes a modern Dispensational view 200 years before Darby came alone and used it as an example of an interpretation, that’s so absurd, that it works as counter argument 😭 "For if in dealing with them someone should wish to hold too tightly to

On the Eucharist in two kinds: "We concede that Christ as consecrator instituted the sacrament under both kinds and gave it to the Apostles under both kinds, who now were priests; thus today the celebrant priest partakes under both kinds, but why this to the laymen?

Let’s goooooo