Register to attend the Censorship in the Sciences conference at USC and hear Michael David Cobb Bowen and Jake 🇺🇸 explain why they started FBT. As a bonus, you'll hear keynotes from Now JonRauch on 🦋, Jacob Mchangama, Wilfred Reilly, and Greg Lukianoff, as well as talks by Musa al-Gharbi,

People don't like talking about taboos, but they like reading about them in secret🤫 Association for Psychological Science covers our taboos paper--the second most read across all APS journals in 2024--in their latest podcast: psychologicalscience.org/news/utc-2025-…

In a conference full of exceptional talks, this one, by the peerless Cory Clark Cory Clark, stood out. Full video now available below: youtu.be/-liIioemFdQ?fe…

The cultural rise of women (and thus the influence of their priorities) contributed to at least three changes over the past 10-20 years: Increased equity over merit-based hierarchy Increased harm-avoidance Increased ostracism (e.g., "cancel culture") youtube.com/watch?v=-liIio…

Consider submitting commentaries or research articles (length is flexible) for our special issue on scientific conflicts! How do scientists navigate conflict? What norms exist for facilitating and regulating conflict? When are scientific conflicts helpful? When are they a

Tonight | From Worriers to Warriors: The Cultural Rise of Women with Cory Clark - mailchi.mp/ilvalues.org/w… Join the conversation live on X with Cory Clark and on YouTube.

How has the rise in women in academia led to a cultural shift of the institution? Cory Clark shared her research in our March Liberal Values Lab. Find the full interview -> youtube.com/live/AUcdKecT3…

📢! We're excited to announce our spring 2025 debate, where we'll will tackle the following resoltuion: RESOLVED: We Must Close the Gender Gap in STEM. The Debate will be held at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) on April 30 at 7 PM. More in 🧵👇 (cc: Christina Hoff Sommers, Cory Clark)

Our debate on closing the gender gap in STEM is two weeks from today! Excited to have Christina Hoff Sommers and Cory Clark among our great lineup of scholars and practitioners. We hope to see you there, and we'll be streaming it on our YouTube channel as well! (Details in next post.)

And the winners of the MIT "gender gap" debate are: Cory Clark & Christina Hoff Sommers, who understand that gene- environment interactions, not simply "barriers" & "discrimination," explain why we don't have 50-50 representation across STEM professions. A lively, interesting debate, and a

Please help my girlfriend Saffy recruit participants for her masters dissertation study! Take the study or share it with your followers to encourage them to take it!

1/ Do AI systems discriminate based on gender when choosing the most qualified candidate for a job? I ran an experiment with several leading LLMs to find out. Here's what I discovered:👇

An engaging debate, organised by MIT Free Speech Alliance on the question of gender-gap in STEM. I highly recommend watching the whole thing, but if short on time, jump to timestamp 22:50 and watch the peerless Cory Clark shine with her characteristic brilliance. youtube.com/live/ePN-BiHMH…

"A surprising theme that emerged from many participants was an increase in skepticism toward behavioral science." link.springer.com/article/10.100…

Insights from 29 scholars who have completed adversarial collaborations (ACs): 1. Humility is a must 2. ACs are hard but produce high quality science 3. Participating in ACs may shake your faith in non-AC science By calvinisch Philip E. Tetlock Cory Clark: link.springer.com/article/10.100…

Social scientists today do their work in silos, surrounded only by those who share their assumptions and intuitions. Adversarial collaborations, therefore, may play a key role in stimulating our collective creativity and scientific innovation. New in Theory and Society:

Next up is our exciting special issue on “Normative Scientific Conflicts,” guest edited by @imhardcory and Maja Graso. Lots of fascinating potential topics for papers in this special issue! For example: · Harm concerns: Is it acceptable for academic journals, professional

Cognitive Chicanery: Five Ways We Dodge Facts That Offend Us My latest post on Subst@ck! [Link below.]