Twitter Beğeni Hilesi

I 100% condemn the statement from LPNH regarding Kamala Harris. It is abhorrent and should never have been posted. As Libertarians, we condemn the use of force, whether committed by governments, individuals, or other political entities. We are dedicated to the principle of

I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals.

Real Libertarians reject the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals.

Chloe They are free to say what they want. I am free to condemn it.

I do not believe in the initiation of force, or aggression, as a means of achieving social or political goals. However, #FAFO.

These new assassins are lame. Our government used to at least set up actual marksmen as patsies.

Not for nothin’ but bloomberg does have the authority to increase U.S. Secret Service staffing for the candidate with 2 attempts. Don’t even need a new law or anything, just a phone call.

Looks like the The REAL Libertarian Party is run by real libertarians.

The Libertarian pledge, a statement individuals must sign in order to join the Libertarian Party of the United States: "I hereby certify that I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals." VoteChaseOliver.com/platform

"We do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals." ~LP Remember, the invocation of the state through legislation and laws is the initiation of violence for political or social goals.

Jim Martin Chase Oliver represents the LP pledge and platform well.

I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals. At all.

Florida has some of the best public information infrastructure in the country, that’s why “Florida man” is a thing, Florida doesn’t conceal and obfuscate information that should rightfully be in the public discourse.

Chase is correct. Those who advocate for social or political change through the initiation of violence are allies of the state.

MY LETTER TO THE FEC, DECLINING TO FILE A PERSONAL FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REPORT . . .

If this were true on any level… we’ve got a problem with training and recruitment way beyond a political violence problem.

If you had a mission to create a low trust society what would you do differently than our own politicians and media are doing now?

Calling for violence for social or political change is actively anti-libertarian. The Non-Aggression Principle (NAP) posits that initiating force or fraud against others is inherently wrong, except when necessary for defense. This principle mandates that any defensive action

Being Libertarian De-power government to make it a useless tool for tyrants, ideologues and profiteers. Make governance about the protections against aggression and contract adjudication and very little else.

Saying, "There ought to be a law," is a call for state violence and anti-libertarian.