The Thunderbolts crew are at least questioning the nature of the Sun, but unfortunately will likely never accept that it emits no visible light or heat. Even experiments may not convince them! Matt Finn: Projecting Nuclear Fusion onto the Sun | Thunderbolts

Was Sri Anandamayi Ma a Gnostic? She had the right idea about laughing though I believe! youtu.be/N5F7b7dwyvo

NASA has never been totally honest about some things the Apollo mission astronauts observed during their missions. The lunar surface lighting is something that if examined closely would raise some serious scientific questions and cast even more doubt on NASAs integrity.

This graphic will be used in my still Draft stage Article entitled "A Newer Model of the Universe" (Yes, it's coming together slowly but surely Eulenum!) which will offer an alternative explanation to the mainstream one. In this case we have at the center the light of Creation,

NASA is doing its best with all 3 though.

Just tried out the Grok image and video creator and it is quite something. I'll work on my prompts to see how close I can come to how I believe the view would change.

I checked with Grok, seems he is correct. Space Data Centers Are Dumb. youtu.be/-w6G7VEwNq0

Interesting.. I was trying to reply to Chris Hadfields latest post regarding the 5 mission planned to land on the moon this year, questioning if any would have a simple light meter in order to determine some very basic scientific facts about the surface illuminance levels.

AI being used for military purposes. youtu.be/_Ux13UEqIYo I asked Grok if xAI was involved: x.com/i/grok/share/2…

Pretty sad state of affairs but some times you just have to laugh. Mr.Newberger is pretty good at making me do so. youtu.be/J5_GR5OzjME

I hope the upcoming Artemis 2 mission is successful as I am really interested in what the crew will see and experience during the mission, and how their experience might compare to that of the Apollo mission crews. In past interactions with Grok about the non-visibility of stars

The Orion crew will get to see an eclipse! I wonder how much of the Sun we will get to see before and after the event? Good opportunity to use that Neutral Density filter!

No report so far of the crew having seen or photographed any stars but Grok still insists they would be visible to properly dark adapted eyes and no bright light from the Sun, Earth, or Moon coming through the windows. The capsule could easily be pointed into deepest space, and

As expected the actual brightness in lux of the Moon the crew is presently observing is unknown and will remain that way as they have no light meter. The reason for this is that a measured value would be much less than the theoretical one based on the lumens value of the Sun. The

So far with the Artemis 2 mission I have been happy with my predictions of what the crew might have seen up until the end of the eclipse. That some stars and even planets were seen around the rim of the moon is to be expected as the line of sight to them passes through the lunar

On their way home I'd like to see the Apollo 16 Low Light Level photography tried again with the D5 or Z9 camera. From half way to the Moon they pointed out towards the Gum nebula and used the most sensitive film available at the time and with exposures of up to 5 minutes I am

According to Grok there will be no more astrophotography during the return portion of their journey. I had hoped for a repeat of the Apollo 16 Low Light photography experiment from about the half way point. Despite long exposures of up to 5 minutes with a very high speed film no

I'm glad and definitely relieved that Artemis 2 voyagers made it safely back home and look forward to them being interviewed in the future and answering a few questions about their experiences. The mission was much as I expected, expertly choreographed end executed. My