And I am not sure why you are ridiculously clinging to a 6 month period of time in the middle of a huge revolution, with a govt that hadn't even got settled as an example of how democracies change rights all the time.

Dont you remember her interview. Its everyone elses fault, they were mean to her & she was the poor victim.

Since when has the police department been "paid guns for hire"? Its their job to protect the PUBLIC, not to interfere with people's freedom of speech, no matter how bad they are a.msn.com/01/en-au/BBUyz…

Oh I already have, I know EXACTLY what it says... Clearly YOU know what it says as well which is why you are too gutless to actually recite it.

Incorrect. No longer selected for means that the trait itself does not increase the chance of SURVIVAL in order for reproduction to happen.

And the funny thing about tribalism is that it is also the cause of in group / out group, racism, sexism, all forms of bigotry, xenophobia and practically every other form of "extreme" views. So eliminating extremism wont solve the problem, as it is caused by tribalism

Just when you think Jess cannot become more of a slut: au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/mafs-star-jess… #mafs #mafsau #marriedatfirstsightau

Jess is now OFFICIALLY a bigger CUNT than Ines. To hurt Ning & Mark just to cover up her lying, cheating despicable behaviour is lower than low. A complete waste of fucking space. Her father should have STAYED gone! #mafs #mafsau #marriedatfirstsightau

I would like to see the phasing out of meat eating, providing synthetic meat is available to replace it. We have always been omnivorous & that has always been natural. We could either be like nature and slaughter it inhumanely, or be cognative humans and slaughter it humanely

It is not a "moral" issue eating meat, because morality is a HUMAN term for humans. It is a moral issue HOW we treat animals as this reflects on us as a species & i would condemn any mistreatment of animals as vehemently as any vegan. I just disagree with your def of "necessary"

If you think only things that are "required" should be done, then you must not have condiments on your food, they arent "necessary". Yet you do, proving yourself wrong

I am also concerned with the death of animals in crop growing. This is a far worse issue than animal farming as absolutely no care is given to those deaths, whereas animal g as rming places then welfare of animals as paramount (or should).

How many birds, rodents, small mammals suffer horrendous pain & suffering in fields being poisoned to protect the crops, dying in ditches with farmers oblivious to the suffering they cause because they are too budy focusing on the crop, not the wildlife?

So you talk about morality & i say it is more humane to farm animals woth their welfare in mind than it is to blindly slaughter them as collateral damage to crop growing. It is about US, not the animals. It is how we choose to behave in relation to animals.

And lastly, i dont go around screaming "murderer" (another human term for humans) to people who dont have the same view as me. You are being not only fractally wrong in doing that, but also bigoted, & in my mind far less moral than eating meat humanely.

Bottom line is that humanity would not.even be here if it wasnt for meat eating, guaranteed, it is our nature & thus doesnt suddenly become a problem because YOU want to take the ignorant step of extending HUMAN morality to animals but only selectively.

When you are ready, i am happy to explain in depth why this is the case. I hold no hope you will understand because you have shown that you srart with answers then try to force everything to fit. But i hope you genuinely try. At worst it would only reinforce your view right?