DANDADAN (2024)

Manifestaciones neurológicas comunes de trastornos endocrinos. Mustafa R. Neurologic Complications of Endocrine Disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2026;32(1):105-130. doi:10.1212/cont.0000000000001658.

Pensar que una tesis debe dar hallazgos novedosos y rápidos es no entender el oficio. Una tesis es enlodarse hasta el alma mientras te abres paso por un terreno que no entiendes del todo. Al final, con más disciplina que talento, llegas a un resultado sencillo, pero defendible.

Most people in machine learning still misunderstand probabilities. A model can be perfectly calibrated and still be completely useless. This was proven more than 40 years ago by DeGroot & Fienberg (1983). Yet many ML papers still miss this point. Here is the idea.

KARINA COVERS "SPARKLE" BY RADWIMPS FROM KIMI NO NA WA OST OMG HER VOICE 😭😭

カリナさんがRADWIMPSのスパークルを日本語で歌っててやばい‼️‼️‼️

¿Metales en el cerebro? 🤔 No es ciencia ficción, es medicina. 🧠⛓️ ​A veces, nuestro cuerpo “olvida” cómo procesar metales esenciales como el hierro, el cobre o el manganeso. Cuando esto sucede, estos metales se acumulan en los ganglios basales y terminan por "cortocircuitar"

Recently, I was teaching the Law of Large Numbers and diversification, so I decided to share this illustration here. As you average more and more independent, identically noisy copies of an image, the noise cancels out and the original emerges. Code in the comments.

Teaching behavioral #neuroanatomy is fun 😉. No AI, just old fashioned "natural intelligence" 😜

📰Revisa esta nota del portal de Joaquín López-Dóriga, donde nuestra especialista, la Dra Mayela Rodríguez Violante, habla sobre los casos de Parkinson en México, en el marco del día mundial de esta enfermedad. 🔗lopezdoriga.com/ciencia-tecnol…

En México, no se regula el acto médico, por eso cualquiera (y con cédula profesional de médico), prescribe patrañas: 1. NO EXISTE la "medicina biológica celular regenerativa". 2. La combinación de esos 4 antibióticos es, en sí mismo, negligencia criminal. Ahora sí: URGE REGULAR

A weak discussion section can make a solid study look intellectually shallow. A strong discussion section should do at least 5 things well: A lot of researchers think the discussion section is where you: → repeat the results → add a few references → mention limitations →

6 Frameworks for Writing Research Papers 1. Abstract (IMRaD Framework) 2. Introduction (CARD Framework) 3. Literature Review (CLAIM Framework) 4. Methodology (PASTE Framework) 5. Results & Discussion (SIRF Framework) 6. Conclusion (RISE Framework)

Statisticians are trained in how to compute statistics, but not why to compute statistics. At least 10% of their training should be in philosophy of statistics. They should also spend 10 credits on their own empirical research project to understand how data is acually collected.

En toda ponencia, panel o simposio, normalicemos el callar y apagar el micrófono al improvisado de la audiencia que sale con su: "más que una pregunta es un comentario..." 😡😡😡

AI is already reshaping primary care—but implementation is fragmented and can overlook the realities of front-line services. A Viewpoint in The Lancet Primary Care discusses the future of artificial intelligence in primary care: spkl.io/6016A22cG

Making a heatmap is an essential skill for a bioinformatician. But you probably do not understand heatmap. 7 reading resources to understand heatmap! 🧵

Viviendo en el infierno de la ciencia. 😂

🌷🧠El dia de hoy en el marco del Día Mundial del Parkinson, nuestro Dir. Gral. Dr. Antonio Arauz Góngora, y nuestros especialistas, Dr. Ruben Martínez Hernández, Dra. Mayela Rodríguez Violante y Dr. Alberto Ruíz Chow, participaron en el Foro Parkinson: un reto de salud.

A recent survey of 376 healthcare professionals revealed that 63% DID NOT understand the concept of a p-value. Do you think you can pass the P-value explanation test❓ Are you part of the 63%? Let's break it down in simpler terms…