t.Helper() in Go tests: makes t.Fatalf report the failure at the caller's line, not inside the helper. One line, huge debugging win when a helper is used by multiple test cases.

Everyone says Neovim 0.12 breaks your config. They're lying to you. It's 3 fixes. 15 minutes. I migrated my 1100-line config tonight. 2 API replacements. 1 deletion. Took 10 minutes. If you've been putting off the upgrade, this is your sign. It's not as scary as the internet

Okay cuda old versions are kept as it is in the system

yes hallucinations but its okay no one is upset. AGI is here (I am rooting for it)

one thing which is good it finally understood to use co-authored by 😂

😂

It always over-complicate stuff for no reason I am tired. Earlier it was much better I don't have to deal with this 😌

We forgot one thing docker buildx prune

sudo systemctl restart systemd-timesyncd.service

claude design and opus 4.7 is slopops and sonnect 4.6 and opus 4.6 were better

Just a simple command is what you need claude --model claude-opus-4-6 Opus 4.7 is bad

Not sure how during the plan phase the model didn't get any permission issues and got to the execution Weird

Gemma models are bad unable to do proper debugging and finxing my codebase MinMax 2.5(opencode) and qwen3.5-9b-opus-4.6-T:Q5_K_M llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server -m vllm/Qwen3.5-9B-Q5_K_M.gguf --port 8000 -c 131072 --host 0.0.0.0 -ngl auto --cache-type-k bf16 --cache-type-v

how to use claude ai design ?? effectively or its was just hype like google stitch? any specific recommendations on how to use it

Traces or Events (it depends) -> Logs -> Metrics(only specific scenarios -> at this point if you don't understand it means something interesting is bad going on -> try to check the code -> still problem time for some Debugging sessions. there a lot of times we can get a AI agent

Playing around the AI inference layer is soo much interesting.