Counterpoint: if you’re gonna interview economists working for capital, then also interview economists working for labour.

Capital gains on primary residences remains exempt.

People saying this are misinformed or spreading disinformation.

'There is no clear evidence from experience that the investment policy which is socially advantageous coincides with that which is most profitable.'

- John Maynard Keynes, 1936

The greatest trick the 0.1% ever pulled was convincing people that we need them to own things.

Another Conservative on the side of the 0.1% that owns instead of working.

We have access to abundant natural resources and skilled knowledgeable labour.

We don’t need the parasites who don’t want to work and just want to be paid for owning.

People who don’t know the difference between “creation” and “control” aren’t competent commentators.

Style and policy icon.

Maybe people who can sabotage our jobs and prices shouldn’t be allowed to control our production.

Advocate for “common sense” thinks we build houses out of rich people’s money.

Exactly why we need a serious conversation on Canada’s care economy. Will the sectoral table promised in today’s budget yield the right results? Only if it’s connected with investment and there’s political will to address all aspects of care in an integrated way

It’s true!

Turns out that you can support trans inclusion AND oppose destructive wealth concentration.

Weird. It’s almost like something happened in recent years to make things a lot more expensive….

Did you know that we build houses out of rich people’s money?

CPC candidate comes out firmly on the side of the 0.1%.

I guess these are the boots his leader meant.

People who own instead of working are upset they're still going to be taxed less than workers.