Angels also have their own glory. Luke 9:26 ...when He shall come in His own ***glory*** and in His Father’s and ***of the holy angels***.

The Incoherence of the Philosophers, al-Ghazālī argued: “If the world has always existed, then an infinite number of actual temporal events must have passed. But an actual infinite cannot exist in reality — especially not one formed by successive addition.” An actual infinite

Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian Al Ghazali has never been refuted. Not by Aquinas. Not by anyone.

The Argument from Time and Contingency 1. We notice around us things that come into being and go out of being. A tree, for example, grows from a tiny shoot, flowers brilliantly, then withers and dies. 2. Whatever comes into being or goes out of being does not have to be;

Your argument hinges on the idea that if ( P ) is an actual infinite containing all past events, there shouldn’t be any past event outside it. If you can add enewe_{\text{new}}e_{\text{new}} , it means ( P ) lacked that event, undermining its claim to be a complete, actual

Every vision of Christ in the scriptures portrays him as separate and distinct from God... the God he continually worships: 1️⃣ Acts 7:55–56 — Stephen’s vision -Stephen sees Jesus standing at the right hand of God as two distinct beings. 2️⃣ Acts 9:3–6 — Saul’s (Paul’s) vision

The dative forms used here in Rev 5:13 τῷ καθημένῳ ("to the One sitting") and τῷ Ἀρνίῳ ("to the Lamb") which grammatically distinct and coordinate two concepts. The conjunction καί ("and") clearly separates two persons. The article τῷ is repeated, one for each noun

Design Argument 1. Parts organized in a purposefully and orderdly manner are features produced by intelligence 2. The human body has its parts organized in a purposefully and orderdly manner 3. Therefore, the human body parts organized in a purposefully and orderdly manner are

He Had No Pace. No Tricks. But No One Could Handle Zidane youtu.be/f6YGOiOHPPc?si… via YouTube

🧵Scholars say Church Father, Justin Martyr, AGREES With Jehovah’s Witnesses View of the Logos (Jesus) 1. Robert M. Grant “Justin makes the Logos a secondary deity, clearly subordinate.” 🔹 View: Real ontological hierarchy, not just functional. 2. Adolf von Harnack “The

youtu.be/vIzsKMtdVBA?si…

My view on God's attributes "understood" by AI: Not divine simplicity nor parts. Both extreme are avoided: You're drawing a key distinction between a part and a manifestation in the context of God's attributes. A part implies something separable, divisible, or independent, even

Khalil Andani, PhD Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian Not at all. That would only follow if these manifestations were externalized or distinct from God’s essence. But in this framework, they are neither separate nor dependent realities, they are God Himself revealing His indivisible essence in diverse ways, not entities alongside or

Prime Bible Welp, go ahead and prove it. I am waiting. And about John 1:1, lol that is FALSE Here’s proof 👇🏽 Your own Trinitarian Scholars agree that the New World Translation and others of John 1:1 is accurate 😭🥂 These Trinitarian scholars honestly acknowledge that John 1:1c in