🔥Telegram İfşa

Excited to launch goodcrypto.net — my new site exploring the intersection of crypto, law, and policy. Here's what I've been working on lately and what you'll find there, from MEV legal analysis to EU regulatory threats to public blockchains.

Are stablecoin issuers at risk from EU privacy law? Can EU law push crypto in a direction of more technical privacy? Read my new post (and subscribe to the newsletter for future content!) goodcrypto.net/does-the-eu-gd…

The REV vs MEV debate prompted me to update 'How I understand "MEV"?' (check goodcrypto [dot] net). I'm not convinced with defining MEV as just "out-of-protocol" or "state contention" revenue. Both state and block-space contention cause validator/sequencer revenue and both come

Mikolaj is one of the leading legal thinkers on MEV and related topics. Do yourself a favor and subscribe to his blog!

Some updates on goodcrypto.net: I uploaded notes of past Crypto Law Seminars. I also "Claude Coded" llms.txt functionality and markdown versions for all posts (for LLMs). I'm more of a Python person, so I deliberately chose JavaScript-based 11ty as a site generator for

I’m grateful to the Ethereum Foundation EF Ecosystem Support Program for an academic research grant to work on "MEV Law and Policy in 2025”, as part of the 2025 Academic Grants Round. More MEV content on the "Good crypto" website and elsewhere soon!

New on Good crypto: FOCIL on Ethereum and legally credible neutrality The debate over whether Ethereum's next major upgrade (Glamsterdam) should include fork‑choice enforced inclusion lists (FOCIL, EIP‑7805) has been framed primarily as an engineering and incentive‑design

On soispoke.eth 's suggestion I updated my analysis to clarify that while FOCIL inclusion list committee members theoretically have discretion to modify client software rules on transaction inclusion, they face significant practical barriers—including technical expertise

Highly insightful legal analysis of FOCIL by 0xMikolaj goodcrypto.net/focil-on-ether…

“Builders select and order transactions, and—under the current ePBS draft proposal—enjoy a non‑trivial “free option” to withhold reveal within the ePBS timing window, paying the committed value but causing an “empty” execution side in that slot if they exercise the option. This