Didn't realize I asked important questions😀 But thanks for the recognition and for keeping the conversation going Mr Bee | CM! Curious to hear others input on this question (see tweet below).

Four core categories of DeSci: ➥ Funding. ➥ Integrity. ➥ Ownership. ➥ Censorship. Yet, most DeSci projects today are only focused on 𝐅𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆. Catch this: x.com/i/spaces/1OwxW… Timestamp: 49:22 What do you think? 👇

Love this convo But who has the answer to this? How transparent can we even go in terms of spending in DeSci? Would love to hear different thoughts 💭 Paul Kohlhaas bio/acc Bio Protocol SpineDAO Spectruth DAO Cerebrum DAO 🧠 Eli Mohamad CryoDAO… And a host of others too numerous to

Some researchers are still scared of putting their work on-chain. And honestly? That fear is valid. Scientific work is personal, precise, and hard-earned. But here’s the truth: DeSci was built to protect and not expose you. Let me explain:

How do you feel when you find out your favourite celebrity couple is getting a divorce? All that lovey-dovey energy on social media was just a facade, a make-believe fairytale. Then you hear the shocking part: one of them confesses the other was abusive and narcissistic. And of

Had the idea first? Wrote the paper? Made the beat? Sketched the design? But can you prove it? Ideas get stolen daily not because you’re not smart, but because you didn’t protect your work. Students. Researchers. Musicians. Writers. Want proof of creation? Let’s iStamp it🔻🧵

DeSci is Coming

Is it original? Of course it’s certified on iStamp!