less “ico mania”, more capital formation with constraints that difference matters more than people think

pivot to Artemis today

used @remotion to ship this in ~3hrs i’m not a pro editor but the amount of stuff you can build and experiment with in remotion is honestly insane learned a lot, had fun, shipped

x.com/i/article/2018…

feels like hiring posts have turned into a content strategy and not an actual hiring strategy

bring users in with social + incentives, then narrow the product to the core business once scale is there

🚢🚢🚢

crypto x ai update because this is moving faster than most people think we’re watching: – agents as mini ceos (agentinc model) – ai only social layers like moltbook with 1m+ agents – onchain arenas where agents trade against each other – gpu sharing + decentralized compute

time to cook

everyone mocked ICOs for years. now community token sales are quietly clearing billions again difference? this time it’s KYC’d. mechanism designed and regulatory aware same primitive. new operating system markets don’t forget. they refine

not tweeting much - reading docs - tracking onchain flows - connecting dots around CyreneAI article dropping soon

wasn’t planning to spend this much time on cyrene ai tbh but the more i map it out, the more it feels like it sits somewhere important

update: this isn’t just about cyrene ai as a product. it’s about where it sits in the stack and that stack is shifting fast

ICOs failed because there were no guardrails VCs fixed it and created low float, high-fdv extraction machines two different aesthetics. same misalignment

most early teams don’t need $10M. they need: – modest capital – fast feedback – aligned holders all they’ve been getting the opposite